The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invited review: Learning from the future—A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067
Open accessAbstract
The world's population will reach 10.4 billion in 2067, with 81% residing in Africa or Asia. Arable land available for food production will decrease to 0.15 ha per person. Temperature will increase in tropical and temperate zones, especially in the Northern Hemisphere, and this will push growing seasons and dairy farming away from arid areas and into more northern latitudes. Dairy consumption will increase because it provides essential nutrients more efficiently than many other agricultural systems. Dairy farming will become modernized in developing countries and milk production per cow will increase, doubling in countries with advanced dairying systems. Profitability of dairy farms will be the key to their sustainability. Genetic improvements will include emphasis on the coding genome and associated noncoding epigenome of cattle, and on microbiomes of dairy cattle and farmsteads. Farm sizes will increase and there will be greater lateral integration of housing and management of dairy cattle of different ages and production stages. Integrated sensors, robotics, and automation will replace much of the manual labor on farms. Managing the epigenome and microbiome will become part of routine herd management. Innovations in dairy facilities will improve the health of cows and permit expression of natural behaviors. Herds will be viewed as superorganisms, and studies of herds as observational units will lead to improvements in productivity, health, and well-being of dairy cattle, and improve the agroecology and sustainability of dairy farms. Dairy farmers in 2067 will meet the world's needs for essential nutrients by adopting technologies and practices that provide improved cow health and longevity, profitable dairy farms, and sustainable agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision
Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J., Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.288998 · Cited by 3,093
Clark, M., & Tilman, D. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5 · Cited by 989
Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency
Jami, E., White, B. A., & Mizrahi, I. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085423 · Cited by 588 · cited 1×
“Jami et al. (2014) fed primiparous Holstein cows the same TMR during first lactation but found that the ratio of the 2 dominant phyla of rumen organisms (Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes) ranged from 2:1 to 1:3, and this ratio was correlated (R2 = 0.52) with milk fat yield.”
BackgroundInfluentialPreweaning milk replacer intake and effects on long-term productivity of dairy calves
Soberon, F., Raffrenato, E., Everett, R. W., & Van Amburgh, M. E. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4391 · Cited by 575
García-Ruiz, A., Cole, J. B., VanRaden, P. M., Wiggans, G. R., Ruiz-López, F. J., & Van Tassell, C. P. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1519061113 · Cited by 573
What is stress, and how does it affect reproduction?
Dobson, H., & Smith, R. F. (2000) · Animal Reproduction Science · doi:10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00080-4 · Cited by 549
Self-citationRe-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock
Wilkinson, J. M. (2011) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s175173111100005x · Cited by 435
Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains – a global life cycle assessment
Opio, C., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., MacLeod, M. J., Vellinga, T. V., Henderson, B. B., & Steinfeld, H. (2013) · Cited by 396
Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations
Shanks, O. C., Kelty, C. A., Archibeque, S., Jenkins, M., Newton, R. J., McLellan, S. L., Huse, S. M., & Sogin, M. L. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02988-10 · Cited by 359
Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review
Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Abecia, L., & Newbold, C. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01133 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Bio-based fertilizers: A practical approach towards circular economy
Chojnacka, K., Moustakas, K., & Witek-Krowiak, A. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122223 · Cited by 545
The Irish dairy industry – recent history and strategy, current state and future challenges
Kelly, P., Shalloo, L., Wallace, M., & Dillon, P. (2020) · International Journal of Dairy Technology · doi:10.1111/1471-0307.12682 · Cited by 81
Boyle, L. A., & Mee, J. F. (2021) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.645537 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Britt, J. H., Cushman, R. A., Dechow, C. D., Dobson, H., Humblot, P., Hutjens, M. F., Jones, G. A., Ruegg, P. S., Sheldon, I. M., & Stevenson, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3722-3741
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789170334
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 26.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invited review: Learning from the future—A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.2017-14025
- The paper
- Britt, J. H., Cushman, R. A., Dechow, C. D., Dobson, H., Humblot, P., Hutjens, M. F., Jones, G. A., Ruegg, P. S., Sheldon, I. M., & Stevenson, J. S. (2018). Invited review: Learning from the future—A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.