Effects of inoculants Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus parafarraginis on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of corn stover silage
Open accessAbstract
To improve silage quality of crop forages, bacterial inoculants are often employed. In this study, Lactobacillus brevis SDMCC050297 and Lactobacillus parafarraginis SDMCC050300 were used as inoculants to corn stover in lab silos for ensiling. At the initial stage of ensiling, the pH value of the inoculated silages reduced more drastically, and the inoculated silages had higher lactic acid and acetic acid contents. After 20 days of ensiling, a reduction in lactic acid content coupled with an increase in acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol contents was observed in inoculated silages. Furthermore, both the amount of lactic acid bacteria and the abundance of order Lactobacillales in inoculated silages were higher than those of controls in the whole process. Meanwhile, Lb . brevis predominated before day 20 and then the dominance was shifted to Lb . parafarraginis until the late stage of ensiling. In contrast, the epiphytic Lactococcus lactic and Lb . plantarum played major roles at the beginning of naturally fermented silages and then Lb . plantarum and Lb . brevis were the most abundant at the later stage. In conclusion, these two selected strains had capability of improving the silage quality and providing the reproducible ensiling process, thus having the potential as silage inoculants.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Inoculating corn stover silage with *Lactobacillus brevis* SDMCC050297 and *Lactobacillus parafarraginis* SDMCC050300 accelerated acidification, increased acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol after day 20, and shifted the bacterial community toward the inoculated lactobacilli. The authors conclude these strains improved silage fermentation and have potential as silage inoculants.
Key findings
- Inoculated silages showed more rapid pH reduction and higher lactic acid and acetic acid early in ensiling; after day 20, lactic acid decreased while acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol increased in inoculated silages.
- By the end of fermentation, the lactic acid:acetic acid ratio was 1.27 ± 0.02 in inoculated silages versus 3.97 ± 0.2 in controls (P = 0.006); in the latter phase, LAB numbers in inoculated silages were 11.2-fold higher than controls (P = 0.005).
- Average abundance of order Lactobacillales was 54.75% in inoculated silages versus 39.22% in controls. *Lb. brevis* predominated before day 20, reaching 55.74% at day 10 versus 5.58% in controls, then *Lb. parafarraginis* dominated inoculated silages at day 45 with 61.63%.
- In controls, epiphytic *Lactococcus lactic* and *Lb. plantarum* played major early roles, with *Lb. plantarum* and *Lb. brevis* most abundant later.
Methods
- Lab-scale silos: chopped corn stover (about 20-mm length) packed into 2 L laboratory silos; inoculated with *Lb. brevis* SDMCC050297 and *Lb. parafarraginis* SDMCC050300 mixed 1:1 at 1.0 × 10^8 cfu/kg fresh matter; controls received no inoculant; stored at room temperature (around 15 °C) and opened at days 1, 3, 6, 10, 20, 30, and 45.
- Fermentation analyses measured pH, water-soluble carbohydrates, lactic acid, acetic acid, and 1,2-propanediol by HPLC, plus LAB and enterobacteria counts on MRS and LB agar.
- Microbial community analysis used 16S rDNA V3–V4 amplicon sequencing on Illumina MiSeq 2 × 300, with OTUs assigned at 97% similarity and classification using RDP classifier, SILVA, and BLASTn; diversity indices included Shannon and Chao 1. Statistical data were presented as mean ± standard deviation using SPSS.
Limitations
- The paper does not state a limitations section.
- Evident from the text: findings are from lab-scale 2 L silos at around 15 °C, using one corn stover source/harvest and a 45-day ensiling period, so scale, location, and longer-term outcomes are not tested.
- Evident from the text: the study reports fermentation and microbial community changes but does not report aerobic stability, animal performance, or silage intake outcomes; datasets are stated to be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In inoculated silages, high abundance of Lb. brevis and Lb. parafarraginis was detected.
“In inoculated silages, high abundance of Lb. brevis and Lb. parafarraginis were detected (Fig. 4B,C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ten most commonly occurring OTUs belonging to order Lactobacillales were Lb. plantarum, Lb. brevis, Lb. parafarraginis, L. lactic, Ln. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. farciminis, Lactobacillus sp., Weissella sp., P. pentosaceus and L. piscium.
“These species were Lb. plantarum, Lb. brevis, Lb. parafarraginis, L. lactic, Ln. pseudomesenteroides, Lb. farciminis, Lactobacillus sp., Weissella sp., P. pentosaceus and L. piscium, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The LAB number of controls and inoculated silages first increased and then decreased, with the peak value at day 10.
“The LAB number of the controls and inoculated silages first increased and then decreased, with the peak value appeared at day 10 (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The average abundance of order Lactobacillales in inoculated silages (54.75%) was greater than in controls (39.22%).
“Furthermore, both the amount of lactic acid bacteria and the abundance of order Lactobacillales in inoculated silages were higher than those of controls in the whole process.”
- Also stated in: § Taxonomic characterization of microbial communities by 16S rDNA analysis · plain
“The average abundance of Lactobacillales in inoculated silages (54.75%) was greater than that in controls (39.22%) (supplementary Fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Taxonomic characterization of microbial communities by 16S rDNA analysis · plain
- Findingown data
Before day 6 of ensiling, inoculated silages had higher lactic acid and acetic acid contents than controls.
“At the initial stage of ensiling, the pH value of the inoculated silages reduced more drastically, and the inoculated silages had higher lactic acid and acetic acid contents.”
- Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
“Before day 6, the inoculated silages had higher levels of lactic acid and acetic acid than those in controls (Fig. 1B,C), indicating the positive roles of the heterofermentative inoculants in the ensiling process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
- Findingown data
16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that the two isolates had 99% identity with Lb. brevis ATCC14869 and Lb. parafarraginis ZH1, respectively.
“16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that these two isolates showed 99% identity with Lb. brevis ATCC14869 (M58810) and Lb. parafarraginis ZH1 (JN987663), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Good's coverage was greater than 99% for all samples.
“Good’s coverage were greater than 99% for all samples, suggesting that the present study captured the dominant phylotypes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The initial epiphytic LAB in corn stover was 9.24 ± 0.47 × 10^9 cfu/kg.
“The initial epiphytic LAB and enterobacteria in corn stover were 9.24 ± 0.47 × 109 and 2.73 ± 0.19 × 1011 cfu/kg, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The amount of lactic acid bacteria in inoculated silages was higher than in controls throughout the ensiling process.
“Furthermore, both the amount of lactic acid bacteria and the abundance of order Lactobacillales in inoculated silages were higher than those of controls in the whole process.”
- Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
“Nevertheless, the LAB number of the inoculated silages was higher than that of controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
- Findingown data
The two LAB strains SDMCC050297 and SDMCC050300 could grow at an initial pH of 3.5 and a lowest temperature of 15 °C.
“They were Gram-positive, catalase-negative and heterofermentative bacteria, and could grow at initial pH value of 3.5 and lowest temperature of 15 °C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the initial stage of ensiling, the pH of inoculated silages decreased more drastically than that of controls.
“At the initial stage of ensiling, the pH value of the inoculated silages reduced more drastically, and the inoculated silages had higher lactic acid and acetic acid contents.”
- Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
“However, accumulation of organic acids and decrease of pH value in inoculated silages were more drastically than those of controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
- Findingown data
The abundance of Bacillus, Salmonella, Klebsiella and Pseudomonas in inoculated silages was lower than in controls.
“However, the abundance of these genera in inoculated silages is lower than that in controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The abundance of Lb. plantarum and L. lactic in controls was higher than in inoculated silages.
“The abundance of Lb. plantarum and L. lactic in controls were higher than that in inoculated silages (Fig. 4A,D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Enterobacter, Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas were predominant at the early stage of ensiling.
“Enterobacter, Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas were predominant at the early stage of ensiling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
By the end of fermentation, the ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid was 1.27 ± 0.02 in inoculated silages and 3.97 ± 0.2 in controls (P = 0.006).
“By the end of fermentation, the ration of lactic acid to acetic acid in inoculated silages was 1.27 ± 0.02, while 3.97 ± 0.2 in the controls (P = 0.006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The initial enterobacteria in corn stover was 2.73 ± 0.19 × 10^11 cfu/kg.
“The initial epiphytic LAB and enterobacteria in corn stover were 9.24 ± 0.47 × 109 and 2.73 ± 0.19 × 1011 cfu/kg, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Lb. parafarraginis increased dramatically after day 20.
“The species Lb. parafarraginis increased dramatically after day 20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At day 45, Lb. parafarraginis dominated the inoculated silages with a percentage of 61.63%.
“At day 45, it dominated the inoculated silages with the percentage of 61.63%, indicating the reproducible of these two strains in silages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At the beginning of ensiling, the enterobacteria number in inoculated silages was lower than in controls.
“However, at the beginning of ensiling, the enterobacteria number in the inoculated silages was lower than that in controls, indicating the inhibitive effects of these two strains on the growth of enterobacteria although there were higher numbers of enterobacteria over the course of ensiling process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At day 10, the percentage of Lb. brevis was 55.74% in inoculated silages, compared to 5.58% in controls.
“Especially at day 10, the percentage of species Lb. brevis was 55.74%, compared to 5.58% of controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Metagenomic analysis showed that the abundance of Lb. plantarum in inoculated silages at day 1 was much higher than in controls.
“Metagenomic analysis showed that the abundance of Lb. plantarum in inoculated silages at day 1 was much higher than that in controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Lb. brevis and Lb. parafarraginis showed reproducibility at the early and late stages of ensiling.
“Lb. brevis and Lb. parafarraginis showed the reproducibility at the early and late stage of ensiling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The abundance of Bacillus and Salmonella decreased after fermentation.
“and their abundance were decreased after fermentation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, Stenotrophomonas maintained its abundance during fermentation.
“Interestingly, Stenotrophomonas could maintain its abundance during the fermentation process”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The population of viable LAB in inoculated silages increased more rapidly than in controls.
“Here, these two isolates as inoculants were applied as 1.0 × 108 cfu/kg FM and the population of viable LAB in inoculated silages increased more rapidly than controls, indicating that the used LAB inoculants are competitive among the whole LAB communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase of Lb. parafarraginis at late stage was accompanied by significant conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid.
“which was accompanied by the conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid significantly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Epiphytic Lb. parafarraginis can be detected in corn stover.
“Although epiphytic Lb. parafarraginis can be detected in corn stover”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla in both inoculated and control corn stover silages, representing more than 95% of total sequences.
“Taxonomic profiles based on 16S rDNA amplicons showed that Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteriodetes were the dominant phyla, representing more than 95% of the total sequences both in inoculated silages and controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In silages, besides LAB, a large amount of other bacteria existed.
“Except LAB, a large amount of bacteria was also existed in silages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The two strains were more effective in accumulating acetic acid in corn stover silages.
“The two strains Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 were more effective in reducing pH value and accumulation of acetic acid in corn stover silages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, there was a high level of enterobacteria in inoculated silages.
“However, there was high level of the enterobacteria in inoculated silages in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, only Bacillus and Salmonella were detected in silage samples.
“In our study, only Bacillus and Salmonella were detected in silage samples”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The two strains Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 were more effective in reducing pH in corn stover silages.
“The two strains Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 were more effective in reducing pH value and accumulation of acetic acid in corn stover silages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
A reduction in the LAB population after the fermentation period was found in all assessed silages.
“Subsequently, we found a reduction in the LAB population after the fermentation period in all assessed silages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Differences in concentrations of acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol between untreated and inoculated silages became more evident starting at day 20 and continued through day 45.
“Differences in concentrations of acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol between untreated and inoculated silages became more evident starting at day 20 of ensiling and continued through day 45.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The largest LAB populations were observed in silages inoculated with Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300.
“The largest LAB populations were observed in silages inoculated with the strains Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The silages inoculated with Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 contained lower abundance of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella.
“The silages inoculated Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 contained lower abundance of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
In this study, Lb. brevis was the main species present in the early stage of ensiling.
“Lb. brevis was the main species present in the early stage of ensiling”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, Lb. plantarum gradually became the dominant species in the naturally fermented corn stover silage.
“and Lb. plantarum gradually became the dominant species in the naturally fermented corn stover silage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the late stage of ensiling, Lb. parafarraginis increased dramatically.
“At the late stage of ensiling, species Lb. parafarraginis increased dramatically”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In inoculated silages, both LAB number and abundance were significantly increased.
“Both LAB number and abundance of the inoculated silages were significantly increased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, the abundance of L. lactis significantly increased and then reduced over the course of ensiling.
“In the present study, a significant increase and then reduction of the abundance of species L. lactic was detected over the course of ensiling”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The addition of two heterofermentative LAB, Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300, was more effective in promoting rapid production of acetic acid and decrease in pH value.
“However, the addition of two heterofermentative LAB, Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300, was more effective in promotion the rapid production of acetic acid and decrease in pH value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The two selected strains had the capability of improving silage quality.
“In conclusion, these two selected strains had capability of improving the silage quality and providing the reproducible ensiling process, thus having the potential as silage inoculants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The two selected strains have potential as silage inoculants.
“In conclusion, these two selected strains had capability of improving the silage quality and providing the reproducible ensiling process, thus having the potential as silage inoculants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These LAB species were common inhabitants of the corn stover silages.
“This result indicated that these LAB species were common inhabitants of the corn stover silages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 inhibited the growth of other bacteria.
“These results suggested that the Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 inhibited the growth of other bacteria, thus these two selected strains had the ability of affecting the microbial ecology of LAB over the course of the ensiling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The two strains had inhibitive effects on the growth of enterobacteria.
“However, at the beginning of ensiling, the enterobacteria number in the inoculated silages was lower than that in controls, indicating the inhibitive effects of these two strains on the growth of enterobacteria although there were higher numbers of enterobacteria over the course of ensiling process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The two selected strains provided a reproducible ensiling process.
“In conclusion, these two selected strains had capability of improving the silage quality and providing the reproducible ensiling process, thus having the potential as silage inoculants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The present study captured the dominant phylotypes.
“Good’s coverage were greater than 99% for all samples, suggesting that the present study captured the dominant phylotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The two selected strains had the ability to affect the microbial ecology of LAB over the course of ensiling.
“These results suggested that the Lb. brevis SDMCC050297 and Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 inhibited the growth of other bacteria, thus these two selected strains had the ability of affecting the microbial ecology of LAB over the course of the ensiling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The pH value of inoculated silages slightly increased due to the high level of acetic acid.
“Meanwhile, the pH value of inoculated silages slightly increased due to the high level of acetic acid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The two strains were reproducible in silages.
“At day 45, it dominated the inoculated silages with the percentage of 61.63%, indicating the reproducible of these two strains in silages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Homofermentative LAB is necessary for silages.
“the homofermentative LAB was also necessary for silages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lower abundance of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella contributed to the preservation of silage nutrition.
“contributing to the preservation of silage nutrition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid may reduce the antibacterial activity.
“Thus the conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid may reduce the antibacterial activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The pKa of lactic acid is 3.86 and of acetic acid is 4.77.
- Interpretationown data
The reduction in lactic acid content coupled with an increase in acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol contents in inoculated silages suggests that Lb. parafarraginis metabolism was activated.
“In accordance, in this study, a reduction in lactic acid content coupled with an increase in acetic acid and 1, 2-propanediol contents was shown in inoculated silages, suggesting that Lb. parafarraginis metabolism was activated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The epiphytic population of Lb. parafarraginis is unable to lead the silage fermentation.
“this population is unable to lead the silage fermentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The findings help explain why the response (increased acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol) from addition of Lb. parafarraginis is not immediate.
“These findings help to explain why the response (in increased acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol) from the addition of Lb. parafarraginis in silages is not immediate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The decrease in LAB over time was expected because low pH and lack of fermentable substrates result in death of bacteria.
“The decrease in LAB over time was expected because low pH and lack of fermentable substrates result in death of bacteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The acid dissociation constant (pKa) may be implicated in the high level of enterobacteria in inoculated silages.
“The acid dissociation constant (pKa) may be implicated because at low pH, organic acids are mostly in protonated states, and the protons can diffuse into bacterial cells and cause cell death34.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The pKa of lactic acid is 3.86 and of acetic acid is 4.77.
- Interpretationown data
The present data on concentrations of acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol in inoculated silages support the existence of high populations of Lb. parafarraginis in those silages.
“The present data on the concentrations of acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol in inoculated silages support the existence of high populations of Lb. parafarraginis in those silages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Lactic acid, but not acetic acid, plays the major role in the growth inhibition of enterobacteria.
“In consideration of lactic acid, but not acetic acid, played the major role in the growth inhibition of enterobacteria32,35”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] Pedroso, A., Adesogan, A., Queiroz, O. & Williams, S. Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in corn silage with or without various inoculants: Efficacy and mode of action. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 1098–1104 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Nyambe, S., Burgess, C., Whyte, P., O’Kiely, P. & Bolton, D. The fate of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli C600φ3538 (Δvtx2::cat) and its vtx2 prophage during grass silage preparation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 122, 1197–1206 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The used LAB inoculants are competitive among the whole LAB communities.
“Here, these two isolates as inoculants were applied as 1.0 × 108 cfu/kg FM and the population of viable LAB in inoculated silages increased more rapidly than controls, indicating that the used LAB inoculants are competitive among the whole LAB communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
- May combine two claims. 24
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA total of 396 to 651 OTUs were detected.
“A total of 396 to 651 OTUs were detected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFirmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes predominated in all samples, covering more than 95% of the total sequences, and their dominance shifted along the ensiling process.
“Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were predominated in the all samples, covering more than 95% of the total sequences, and the dominance was shifted along with the ensiling process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor each silage sample, 38,566 to 70,967 sequences were obtained.
“For each silage sample 38,566 to 70,967 sequences were obtained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn controls except the day 3 sample, the percentage of Firmicutes first increased and then decreased, while the opposite was observed for Proteobacteria during ensiling.
“In controls (except sample of day 3), the percentages of Firmicutes first increased and then decreased, while the opposite phenomenon was observed for Proteobacteria during the ensiling process (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInoculated silages contained higher abundance of Lactobacillus and lower abundance of Lactococcus, and significantly lower abundance of Pediococcus, Weissella and Leuconostoc compared with controls.
“The inoculated silages contained higher abundance of Lactobacillus and lower abundance of Lactococcus, and significantly lower abundance of Pediococcus, Weissella and Leuconostoc compared with the controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe corn stover used in the silage fermentation was only slightly wilted, with a pH of 5.88 ± 0.01.
“The corn stover used in the silage fermentation was only slightly wilted, with the pH, of 5.88 ± 0.01.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the latter phase of fermentation, the LAB number in inoculated silages reduced more slowly and was 11.2-fold higher than in controls (P = 0.005).
“During the latter phase of fermentation, the LAB number in inoculated silages reduced more slowly with 11.2-fold (P = 0.005) higher than that in controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Chao 1 estimates of diversity were from 1,159 to 1,991, and the Shannon-Weiner diversity indices were from 2.18 to 4.17.
“The Chao 1 estimates of diversity were from 1,159 to 1,991, and the Shannon–Weiner diversity indices were from 2.18 to 4.17.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataL. lactic first increased and then decreased, with high abundance from day 0 to 10, while Lb. plantarum had high abundance from day 10 to 30.
“And species L. lactic first increased and then decreased, with the high abundance at day from 0 to 10, while the high abundance of species Lb. plantarum was in ranges of day 10 to 30.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlong fermentation, the abundance of Enterobacter and Pseudomonas decreased significantly, while the abundance of Stenotrophomonas only decreased a little.
“Along with the fermentation, the abundance of Enterobacter and Pseudomonas decreased significantly, while the abundance of Stenotrophomonas only decreased a little.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLactobacillus and Lactococcus were two dominant genera in controls and inoculated silages, with opposite changes in abundance: Lactococcus decreased while Lactobacillus increased along the ensiling process.
“Lactobacillus and Lactococcus, two dominant genera, could be identified in controls and inoculated silages, but had the opposite changes in abundance: Lactococcus decreased along with the ensiling process while Lactobacillus increased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn inoculated silages, Lb. brevis predominated before day 20, after which dominance shifted to Lb. parafarraginis until the late stage of ensiling.
“Meanwhile, Lb. brevis predominated before day 20 and then the dominance was shifted to Lb. parafarraginis until the late stage of ensiling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn naturally fermented silages, epiphytic Lactococcus lactic and Lb. plantarum played major roles at the beginning, and Lb. plantarum and Lb. brevis were most abundant at the later stage.
“In contrast, the epiphytic Lactococcus lactic and Lb. plantarum played major roles at the beginning of naturally fermented silages and then Lb. plantarum and Lb. brevis were the most abundant at the later stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two LAB strains SDMCC050297 and SDMCC050300 were Gram-positive, catalase-negative and heterofermentative.
“They were Gram-positive, catalase-negative and heterofermentative bacteria, and could grow at initial pH value of 3.5 and lowest temperature of 15 °C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter 20 days of ensiling, inoculated silages showed a reduction in lactic acid content and an increase in acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol contents.
“After 20 days of ensiling, a reduction in lactic acid content coupled with an increase in acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol contents was observed in inoculated silages.”
- Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
“Along with the fermentation process, a significant increasing of acetic acid and 1, 2-propanediol was observed after day 20 in inoculated silages (Fig. 1C,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § The changes of fermentation properties during ensilage · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhen Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 was added as inoculant, its numbers increased markedly but did not dictate fermentation until day 20 of ensiling.
“when Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 was added to silage as an inoculant, the numbers of Lb. parafarraginis increased markedly but did not dictate fermentation until day 20 of ensiling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe epiphytic LAB number of corn stover used in this study was 9.24 × 10^9 cfu/kg FM, much higher than that of corn stover in the studies of Liu et al. (3.47 × 10^8 cfu/kg FM) and Li et al. (1.4 × 10^8 cfu/kg FM).
“The epiphytic LAB number of corn stover used in this study was 9.24 × 109 cfu/kg FM, much higher than that of corn stover in study of Liu et al. (3.47 × 108 cfu/kg FM)14 and Li et al. (1.4 × 108 cfu/kg FM)30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14] Liu, Q. H., Yang, F. Y., Zhang, J. G. & Shao, T. Characteristics of Lactobacillus parafarraginis ZH1 and its role in improving the aerobic stability of silages. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117, 405–416 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Li, D. et al. Identification and antimicrobial activity detection of lactic acid bacteria isolated from corn stover silage. Asian- Australas J. Anim. Sci. 28, 620–631 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn inoculated silages, Lactobacillales abundance was greater and Enterobacteriales lower than controls at order level.
“In the order level, Lactobacillales abundance was greater, and Enterobacteriales was lower (data not shown) in inoculated silages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn this study, Pediococcus sp., Leuconostocs sp. and Weissella sp. were detected.
“We also detect Pediococcus sp., Leuconostocs sp. and Weissella sp., whose roles in corn stover silage have not been extensively studied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe inhibitory effects of acetic acid on yeasts and fungi in silages treated with Lb. buchneri are responsible for the greater aerobic stability of such silages.
“The inhibitory effects of acetic acid on yeasts and fungi in silages treated with Lb. buchneri is responsible for the greater aerobic stability of such silages27,28 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Ranjit, N. K., Taylor, C. C. & Kung, L. Jr. Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on the fermentation, aerobic stability and nutritive value of maize silage. Grass Forage Sci. 57, 73–81 (2002). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Kleinschmit, D. H., Schmidt, R. J. & Kung, L. Jr. The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 88, 2130–2139 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis showed that Lb. buchneri inoculation decreased yeast counts and improved aerobic stability of corn silages.
“A meta-analysis showed that Lb. buchneri inoculation decreased yeast counts and improved aerobic stability of corn silages11.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Kleinschmit, D. H. & Kung, L. Jr. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 4005–4013 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premiseown dataLb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 can convert lactic acid to acetic acid anaerobically, accompanied by the generation of 1,2-propanediol.
“Our previous studies have showed that Lb. parafarraginis SDMCC050300 can convert lactic acid to acetic acid anaerobically, accompanied by the generation of 1,2-propanediol (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAddition of Lb. buchneri to silage enhances anaerobic degradation of lactic acid to acetic acid.
“Addition of Lb. buchneri to silage enhances anaerobic degradation of lactic acid to acetic acid11,17.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Kleinschmit, D. H. & Kung, L. Jr. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 4005–4013 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Oude Elferink, S. J. et al. Anaerobic conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol by Lactobacillus buchneri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 125–132 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe dynamic changes of the bacterial community in inoculated silages were more complex, indicating more complicated interactions between the bacterial flora.
“However, the dynamic changes of bacterial community in inoculated silages was more complex as shown in Fig. 3B, indicating the more complicated interactions between the bacterial flora.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe two isolates SDMCC050297 and SDMCC050300 were identified as Lb. brevis and Lb. parafarraginis, respectively.
“Therefore, the two isolates SDMCC050297 and SDMCC050300 were identified as Lb. brevis and Lb. parafarraginis, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe two selected strains changed the characteristics of silages, especially enhancing the acetic acid content throughout the fermentation process.
“These results indicated that these two selected strains changed the characteristics of silages, especially enhancing the acetic acid content in the whole fermentation process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigh levels of enterobacteria were also observed in alfalfa silages treated with P. acidilactici or P. pentosaceus.
“This phenomenon was also observed in alfalfa silages treated with P. acidilactici or P. pentosaceus 33.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Silva, V. P. et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria with bacteriocinogenic potential on the fermentation profile and chemical composition of alfalfa silage in tropical conditions. J. Dairy. Sci. 99, 1895–902 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLactococci could tolerate lower pH values.
“although Lactococci could tolerate lower pH values38.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Kim, J. H., Shoemaker, S. P. & Mills, D. A. Relaxed control of sugar utilization in Lactobacillus brevis. Microbiology. 155, 1351–1359 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLb. buchneri has been shown to activate at later stages, approximately 45 to 60 days of storage, of ensiling.
“However, Lb. buchneri has been shown to activate at later stages (approximately 45 to 60 days of storage) of ensiling11,29.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Kleinschmit, D. H. & Kung, L. Jr. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 4005–4013 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Driehuis, F., Oude Elferink, S. J. W. H. & Spoelstra, S. F. Anaerobic lactic acid degradation during ensilage of whole crop maize inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri inhibits yeast growth and improves aerobic stability. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87, 583–594 (1999). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEnterobacteria are rapidly eliminated during ensiling of corn, with or without inoculation, along with a rapid drop in pH.
“Previous studies have shown that enterobacteria was rapidly eliminated during ensiling of corn, with or without inoculation along with a rapid drop in pH32.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Pedroso, A., Adesogan, A., Queiroz, O. & Williams, S. Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in corn silage with or without various inoculants: Efficacy and mode of action. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 1098–1104 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAt low pH, organic acids are mostly in protonated states, and protons can diffuse into bacterial cells and cause cell death.
“The acid dissociation constant (pKa) may be implicated because at low pH, organic acids are mostly in protonated states, and the protons can diffuse into bacterial cells and cause cell death34.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics. 30, 614–620 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe displacement of Lactococci by Lactobacilli during fermentation was consistent with the previous observation in alfalfa silage.
“This phenomenon of the displacement of Lactococci by Lactobacilli during the fermentation was consistent with the previous observation in alfalfa silage37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Stevenson, D., Muck, R., Shinners, K. & Weimer, P. Use of real time PCR to determine population profiles of individual species of lactic acid bacteria in alfalfa silage and stored corn stover. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 329–338 (2006).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome species of Stenotrophomonas are related to lignocellulosic biomass degradation.
“and some species of which were related with lignocellulosic biomass degradation41.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Raj, A., Kumar, S. & Singh, S. K. A Highly Thermostable Xylanase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Purification and Partial Characterization. Enzyme Res. 429305 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious reports indicate that Lb. brevis only plays a role in the early period of ensiling.
“which is like previous reports that this species only play a role in the early period of ensiling19,20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Zheng, M. L., Niu, D. Z., Jiang, D., Zuo, S. S. & Xu, C. C. Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar. J. Appl. Microbial. 122, 1456–1470 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Holzer, M., Danner, H., Mayrhuber, E. & Braun, R. The aerobic stability of silages influenced by metabolites of lactic acid bacteria. Meded. Rijksuniv. Gent. Fak. Landbouwkd. Toegep. Biol. Wet. 66, 459–461 (2001).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome species of Bacillus, Clostridium, Listeria, Mycobacterium, Yersinia, Salmonella and Shiga-toxin-producing E. coli are associated with human or animal disease.
“Some species of Bacillus, Clostridium, Listeria, Mycobacterium, Yersinia and Salmonella and Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli are known to associate with disease of human or animal39.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Dunièrea, L., Sindoub, J., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Chevallier, I. & Thévenot-Sergentet, D. Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 182, 1–15 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLactic acid-producing cocci grow vigorously in the early stages of ensiling, creating a suitable environment for Lactobacillus in later stages.
“It has been reported that lactic acid–producing cocci grow vigorously in the early stages of the ensiling process, creating a suitable environment for the growth of Lactobacillus in the later stages36.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Cai, Y., Ohmomo, S. & Kumai, S. Distribution and lactate fermentation characteristics of lactic acid bacteria on forage crops and grasses. Grassl. Sci. 39, 420–428 (1994).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe observed order-level differences were in accordance with the previous report about the composition of microbial communities of silages inoculated with Lb. buchneri CD034.
“This phenomenon was in accordance with the previous report about the composition of the microbial communities of silages inoculated with Lb. buchneri CD03413.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Eikmeyer, F. G. et al. Metagenome analyses reveal the influence of the inoculant Lactobacillus buchneri CD034 on the microbial community involved in grass ensiling. J. Biotechnol. 167, 334–343 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPseudomonas and Klebsiella species can produce biogenic amines, which are linked to decreased protein content and nutritional value of silage.
“Species of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella could produce biogenic amines, which often linked to a decrease in the protein content and nutritional value of the silage40.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Silla Santos, M. H. Biogenic amines: their importance in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 29, 213–231 (1996). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe largest LAB populations might be due to the ability of these strains to survive during fermentation.
“These results might have been due to the ability of these strains to survive during the fermentation process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLb. buchneri could only efficiently improve the aerobic stability of silage at the high temperature of 30 °C.
“Besides, Lb. buchneri could only efficiently improve the aerobic stability of silage at the high temperature (30 °C)14.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Liu, Q. H., Yang, F. Y., Zhang, J. G. & Shao, T. Characteristics of Lactobacillus parafarraginis ZH1 and its role in improving the aerobic stability of silages. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117, 405–416 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe two selected strains had capability of improving silage quality and have potential as silage inoculants.
“All the results proved that these two selected strains had capability of improving the silage quality and have the potential as silage inoculants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Sufficient data are not yet available on the bacterial community dynamics involved in corn stover ensiling.
“Sufficient data are not yet available on the bacterial community dynamics involved in corn stover ensiling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pKa of lactic acid is 3.86 and of acetic acid is 4.77.
“The pKa of lactic acid and acetic acid are 3.86 and 4.77, respectively.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no study concerning the bacterial community dynamics involved in corn stover ensiling.
“However, there is no study concerning the bacterial community dynamics involved in corn stover ensiling.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a recent metasequencing study, Lb. brevis was identified during the early ensiling phase (10-30 days) in the un-inoculated control and Lb. brevis or Lb. parafarraginis treated forage.
“In a recent metasequencing study in which corn stover was inoculated with different Lactobacillus strains, Lb. brevis was identified during the early ensiling phase, i.e., between 10 and 30 days of fermentation, in the un-inoculated control and Lb. brevis or Lb. parafarraginis treated as forage only [43].”
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269 · see citing works
The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., & Glöckner, F. O. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219 · Cited by 33,055 · see citing works
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 20,966 · see citing works
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 20,617 · see citing works
Naive Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., & Cole, J. R. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00062-07 · Cited by 19,770 · see citing works
UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., & Knight, R. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 · Cited by 15,114 · see citing works
A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli
De MAN, J. C., ROGOSA, M., & SHARPE, M. E. (1960) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x · Cited by 5,311 · see citing works
Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets
Schmieder, R., & Edwards, R. A. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 · Cited by 4,989 · see citing works
PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR
Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T., & Stamatakis, A. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593 · Cited by 4,497 · see citing works
Biogenic amines: their importance in foods.
Santos, M. H. S. (1996) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/0168-1605(95)00032-1 · Cited by 1,516 · see citing works
The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria.
Oliver, J. D. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 989 · see citing works
Oude Elferink, S. J. W. H., Krooneman, J., Gottschal, J. C., Spoelstra, S. F., Faber, F., & Driehuis, F. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.1.125-132.2001 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions
Danner, H., Holzer, M., Mayrhuber, E., & Braun, R. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.1.562-567.2003 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage
Weinberg, Z. G., & Muck, R. E. (1996) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x · Cited by 509 · see citing works
The aerobic stability of silage: key findings and recent developments
Wilkinson, J. M., & Davies, D. R. (2013) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00891.x · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Ranjit, N. K., & Kung, L. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74912-5 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Kleinschmit, D. H., & Kung, L. (2006) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72444-4 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Driehuis, F., Elferink, S. J. W. H. O., & Spoelstra, S. F. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00856.x · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Kung, L., & Ranjit, N. K. (2001) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74575-4 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms.
Dunière, L., Sindou, J., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Chevallier, I., & Thévenot-Sergentet, D. (2013) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.006 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage
Kleinschmit, D. H., Schmidt, R. J., & Kung, L. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72889-7 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Reich, L. J., & Kung, L. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.06.002 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Kristensen, N. B., Sloth, K. H., Højberg, O., Spliid, N. H., Jensen, C., & Thøgersen, R. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3136 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Zheng, M. L., Niu, D. Z., Jiang, D., Zuo, S. S., & Xu, C. C. (2017) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13456 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
McGarvey, J. A., Franco, R. B., Palumbo, J. D., Hnasko, R., Stanker, L., & Mitloehner, F. M. (2013) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.12179 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Cao, Y., Cai, Y., Takahashi, T., Yoshida, N., Tohno, M., Uegaki, R., NONAKA, K., & Terada, F. (2011) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3623 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Eikmeyer, F. G., Köfinger, P., Poschenel, A., Jünemann, S., Zakrzewski, M., Heinl, S., Mayrhuber, E., Grabherr, R., Pühler, A., Schwab, H., et al. (2013) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.07.021 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Silva, V. P., Pereira, O. G., Leandro, E. S., Da Silva, T. C., Ribeiro, K. G., Mantovani, H. C., & Santos, S. A. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9792 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Relaxed control of sugar utilization in Lactobacillus brevis
Kim, J.-H., Shoemaker, S. P., & Mills, D. A. (2009) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.024653-0 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Natural populations of lactic acid bacteria isolated from vegetable residues and silage fermentation
Yang, J., Cao, Y., Cai, Y., & Terada, F. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2898 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Ranjit, N. K., Taylor, C. C., & Kung Jr, L. (2002) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2002.00304.x · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Ogunade, I. M., Jiang, Y., Kim, D. H., Pech-Cervantes, A. A., Arriola, K. G., Vyas, D., Weinberg, Z. G., Jeong, K. C., & Adesogan, A. T. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11745 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Screening and selection of lactic acid bacteria strains suitable for ensiling grass.
Saarisalo, E., Skyttä, E., Haikara, A., Jalava, T., & Jaakkola, S. (2007) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03103.x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Li, D., Ni, K., Pang, H., Wang, Y., Cai, Y., & Jin, Q. (2015) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.14.0439 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Stevenson, D. M., Muck, R. E., Shinners, K. J., & Weimer, P. J. (2006) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-005-0170-z · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Lactobacillus plantarum effects on silage fermentation and in vitro microbial yield
Contreras-Govea, F. E., Muck, R. E., Broderick, G. A., & Weimer, P. J. (2013) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.11.008 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Wang, X., Haruta, S., Wang, P., Ishii, M., Igarashi, Y., & Cui, Z. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00099.x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Böjti, T., Kovács, K. L., Kakuk, B., Wirth, R., Rákhely, G., & Bagi, Z. (2017) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.03.017 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from corn stovers
Pang, H., Zhang, M., Qin, G., Tan, Z., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Cai, Y. (2011) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00894.x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Hashemzadeh, F., Khorvash, M., Ghorbani, G. R., Ghasemi, E., Taghizadeh, A., Kargar, S., & Yang, W. Z. (2013) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/jpn.12079 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Endo, A., & Okada, S. (2007) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64618-0 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Liu, Q. H., Yang, F. Y., Zhang, J. G., & Shao, T. (2014) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.12530 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Raj, A., Kumar, S., & Singh, S. K. (2013) · Enzyme Research · doi:10.1155/2013/429305 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Pedroso, A. F., Adesogan, A. T., Queiroz, O. C. M., & Williams, S. K. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2433 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Cai, Y., Ohmomo, S., & KUMAI, S. (1994) · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Li, P., Bai, S., You, M., & Shen, Y. (2016) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.312 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Nyambe, S., Burgess, C., Whyte, P., O'Kiely, P., & Bolton, D. (2017) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13431 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The aerobic stability of silages influenced by metabolites of lactic acid bacteria.
Holzer, M., Danner, H., Mayrhuber, E., & Braun, R. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Álvarez‐Ordóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover‐Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., Cesare, A. D., Hilbert, F., et al. (2021) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6377 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Okoye, C. O., Wang, Y., Gao, L., Wu, Y., Li, X., Sun, J., & Jiang, J. (2022) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127212 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Xu, D., Ding, W., Ke, W., Li, F., Zhang, P., & Guo, X. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.03299 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Gu, Q., Liang, M., ShengLong, M., Zhou, B., Huang, F., Lin, B., & Zou, C. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121835 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Guo, L., Yao, D., Li, D., Lin, Y., Bureenok, S., Ni, K., & Yang, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02998 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Bacterial Dynamics of Wheat Silage
Keshri, J., Chen, Y., Pinto, R., Kroupitski, Y., Weinberg, Z. G., & Sela Saldinger, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01532 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Álvarez‐Ordóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover‐Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., Cesare, A. D., Hilbert, F., et al. (2020) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5965 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Drouin, P., Tremblay, J., & Chaucheyras-Durand, F. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7120595 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Wang, Y., He, L., Xing, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhou, W. J., Pian, R., Yang, F., Chen, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00341-19 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Zhang, S. S., Xu, Z., Qin, L., & Kong, J. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17347 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationRen, F., He, R., Zhou, X., Gu, Q., Xia, Z., Liang, M., Zhou, J., Lin, B., & Zou, C. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121315 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Zi, X., Li, M., Chen, Y., Lv, R., Zhou, H., & Tang, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.631096 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Hu, W., Yang, X., Ji, Y., & Guan, Y. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110605 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Li, Y., Du, S., Sun, L., Cheng, Q., Hao, J., Lü, Q., Ge, G., Wang, Z., & Jia, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.830121 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Determination of water content in corn stover silage using near-infrared spectroscopy
Zhang, M., Zhao, C. C., Shao, Q., Yang, Z., Zhang, X., Xu, X., & Hassan, M. (2019) · International journal of agricultural and biological engineering · doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20191206.4914 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Novel lactic acid bacteria strains as inoculants on alfalfa silage fermentation
Agarussi, M. C. N., Pereira, O. G., de Paula, R. A., da Silva, V. P., Roseira, J. P. S., & Silva, F. F. E. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44520-9 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Sun, H., Cui, X., Li, R., Guo, J., & Dong, R. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125928 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Blajman, J. E., Vinderola, G., Páez, R., & Signorini, M. L. (2020) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859620000386 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Effects of several lactic acid bacteria inoculants on fermentation and mycotoxins in corn silage
Gallo, A., Fancello, F., Ghilardelli, F., Zara, S., Froldi, F., & Spanghero, M. (2021) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114962 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Li, M., Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Zi, X., Lv, R., Tang, J., & Zhou, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.595622 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Gallo, A., Ghilardelli, F., Atzori, A. S., Zara, S., Novak, B., Faas, J., & Fancello, F. (2021) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins13030232 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ferrero, F., Tabacco, E., Piano, S., Casale, M., & Borreani, G. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-18733 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Pereira, G. A., Santos, E. M., de Araújo, G. G. L., de Oliveira, J. S., Pinho, R. M. A., Zanine, A. D. M., Souza, A. F. N., Macêdo, A. J. S., Neto, J. M. C., & Nascimento, T. V. C. (2019) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859620000143 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Interaction between plants and epiphytic lactic acid bacteria that affect plant silage fermentation
Chen, L., Wang, Y., Li, X., MacAdam, J. W., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1164904 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Guo, J., Shen, Y., & Yang, J. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.075 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Kim, B. S., Kim, H., & Kang, S. (2019) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106758 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Zhou, X., Ouyang, Z., Zhang, X., Wei, Y., Tang, S., Ma, Z., Tan, Z., Zhu, N., Teklebrhan, T., & Han, X. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9090598 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hisham, M. B., Hashim, A. M., Hanafi, N. M., Rahman, N. A., Mutalib, N. E. A., Tan, C. K., Nazli, M. H., & Yusoff, N. F. M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08819-4 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Liu, J., Zhao, M., Hao, J., Yan, X., Fu, Z., Zhu, N., Jia, Y., Wang, Z., & Ge, G. (2024) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-024-05501-x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Yang, H.-J., Huang, R., Wang, X., Ma, C., & Zhang, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1063914 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Zi, X., Liu, Y., Chen, T., Li, M., Zhou, H., & Tang, J. (2022) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation8050191 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Zi, X., Li, M., Yu, D., Tang, J., Zhou, H., & Chen, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.627820 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Penland, M., Mounier, J., Pawtowski, A., Tréguer, S., Deutsch, S., & Coton, M. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110344 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Louhasakul, Y., Treu, L., Kougias, P., Campanaro, S., Cheirsilp, B., & Angelidaki, İ. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126606 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Li, M., Zi, X., Zhou, H., Lv, R., Tang, J., & Cai, Y. (2021) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/asj.13635 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Xu, Z., Zhang, S., Mu, Y., & Kong, J. (2017) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.044 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, M., Wang, X., Cui, M., Wang, Y., Jiao, Z., & Tan, Z. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192368 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Zhou, W. J., Wang, C., Yang, F., Chen, X., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13588 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Jaipolsaen, N., Sangsritavong, S., Uengwetwanit, T., Angthong, P., Plengvidhya, V., Rungrassamee, W., & Yammuen-art, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.784535 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Tang, X., Liao, C., Huang, X., Chen, C., Xu, D., & Chen, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1247254 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Huang, Z., Wang, M., Ke, W., & Guo, X. (2021) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture11070590 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Determination of water content in corn stover silage using near-infrared spectroscopy
Zhang, M., Zhao, C. C., Shao, Q., Yang, Z., Zhang, X., Xu, X., & Hassan, M. (2019) · International journal of agricultural and biological engineering · doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20191205.4914 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Zhao, M., Zhang, H., Pan, G., Yin, H., Sun, J., Yu, Z., Bai, C., & Xue, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1052837 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Chen, R., Li, M., Yang, J., Chen, L., Zi, X., Zhou, H., & Tang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.971426 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ke, W., Wang, Y., Rinne, M., Franco, M., Li, F., Lin, Y., Zhang, Q., Cai, Y., & Zhang, G. (2023) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12619 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Lactic acid bacteria diversity in corn silage produced in Minas Gerais (Brazil)
Santos, A. O., Ávila, C. L. D. S., Soares, C. M. G., Carvalho, B. F., Schwan, R. F., & Lima, N. (2019) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-019-01528-w · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Long, S., Li, X., Yuan, X., Su, R., Pan, J., Chang, Y., Shi, M., Cui, Z., Huang, N., & Wang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.864649 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Sun, R., Yuan, X., Li, J., Tao, X., Dong, Z., & Shao, T. (2021) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.15064 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Jung, J. S., Wong, J. W. C., Soundharrajan, I., Lee, K.-W., Park, H. S., Kim, D., Choi, K. C., Chang, S. W., & Ravindran, B. (2024) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142920 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Endoglucanase improve the growth of homofermentative Lactobacillus spp. in ensilages
Zhang, S., Xu, Z., Wang, T., & Kong, J. (2019) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.02.010 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, X., Zhang, Z., Song, L., Wang, G., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-019-00684-z · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Vega, H. R., Arteaga-Garibay, R. I., Maya, O., Gómez-Rodríguez, V. M., Chávez-Díaz, I. F., Ruvalcaba-Gómez, J. M., Heredia-Nava, D., Martínez-Loperena, R., & Zelaya-Molina, L. X. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8101503 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Ling, W., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Chen, S., Zhou, J., & Yang, F. (2025) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06340-0 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ahmed, M. G., Al-Sagheer, A. A., El-Waziry, A. M., El-Zarkouny, S. Z., & Elwakeel, E. A. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13091543 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
Wei, S. N., Jeong, E. C., Li, Y. F., Kim, H. J., Ahmadi, F., & Kim, J. G. (2021) · Journal of Animal Science and Technology · doi:10.5187/jast.2021.e131 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Huang, S., Ke, W., Lu, Q., Gao, L., Zhou, D. X., & Ma, Y. C. (2023) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation9110949 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Leite, G. M., Santos, E. M., de Oliveira, J. S., Pereira, D. M., de Oliveira, C. J. B., Cavalcanti, J. V. F. L., de Lima, V. M. R., de Lima, J. P. V. D. M. F., Gomes, P. G. B., Edvan, R. L., et al. (2025) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture15030241 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Antimicrobial resistance determinants in silage
Nagy, S. Á., Tóth, A. G., Papp, M., Kaplan, S., & Solymosi, N. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09296-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Ferulic Acid Esterase Producing Lactobacillus johnsonii from Goat Feces as Corn Silage Inoculants
Andrada, E., Mechoud, M. A., Mukdsi, M. C. A., Dib, E. P. C., Cerviño, S., Chaia, A. P., & Medina, R. B. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10091732 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zuo, S., Jiang, D., Niu, D., Zheng, M., Ya, T., & Xu, C. (2019) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.19.0344 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lactobacillus Use for Plant Fermentation: New Ways for Plant-Based Product Valorization
Rouzic, M. L., Bruniaux, P., Raveschot, C., Krier, F., Phalip, V., Ravallec, R., Cudennec, B., & Coutte, F. (2022) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.104958 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Park, M. K., Choi, H.-S., Kim, Y. S., & Cho, I. H. (2019) · Food Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10068-018-00549-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Hao, L., Jiang, F., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Hu, H., You, W., Hu, X., Cheng, H., Wang, C., & Song, E. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1399907 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Zhang, C., Zou, H., Hu, R., Peng, Q., Xue, B., Wang, L., Wu, F., Tang, Y., Wang, Z., & Xiao, J. (2025) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation11030107 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Carrillo-Barragán, P., Dolfing, J., Sallis, P. J., & Gray, N. (2020) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2020.107875 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Bakri, M. M. (2021) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.16.4.8366-8378 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lee, E.-H., Jeong, H., Kim, E., Lee, Y.-R., & Shim, J. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12030642 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Xu, W., Lv, Z., Guo, Q., Deng, Z., Yang, C., Cao, Z., Li, Y., Huang, C., Wu, Z., Chen, S., et al. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00533-23 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lactobacillus - A Multifunctional Genus
Laranjo, M. (2022) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.98170 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Andrada, E., Marquez, A., Dib, E. P. C., Gauffin-Cano, P., & Medina, R. B. (2023) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation9040331 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Mu, L., Cao, X., Wang, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2025) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation11020059 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chen, Q., Liu, Z., Zhou, C., Zhong, Z., Wu, J. Q., Jiang, A., Yang, H., 谭志诚, Lukuyu, B. A., & Kang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2026.1753173 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The promotion and inhibition of proteolysis in silages during ensiling of citrus waste
Zhou, Y., Liu, W., Liu, Y., & Shen, Y. (2024) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116051 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Use of lactic and propionic acid bacteria in the procurement of corn silage
Vuhliar, V., Vuhliar, Y., Syrovatko, І., Honchar, L. O., & Vyhovska, I. O. (2024) · Feeds and Feed Production · doi:10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202497-12 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wahyudi, A., Hendraningsih, L., Sutawi, S., & Siskawardani, D. D. (2022) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d230710 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Silage Inoculant Candidate
Rohmatussolihat, Ridwan, R., Astuti, W. D., Fidriyanto, R., Meliah, S., Sarwono, K. A., Fitri, A., Sopiani, P., Ragamustari, S. K., Ilyas, M., et al. (2024) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1377/1/012082 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Blajman, J. E., Lingua, M. S., Irazoqui, J. M., Santiago, G. M., Eberhardt, M. F., Amadío, A., Peralta, G. H., & Gaggiotti, M. (2023) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s002185962400011x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Dou, Q., Luo, B., Dai, X., Wang, P., Guo, C., Zhao, L., Tang, Y., Yang, X., & Zhou, S. (2024) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation10080434 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Venturini, T., Neres, M. A., Tinini, R. C. D. R., Dessbesell, J. G., Schneider, P. R., Schneider, C. R., Muxfeldt, L., Baungratz, A. R., Fischer, M., & Zambom, M. A. (2024) · Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira · doi:10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2024.v59.03687 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Astuti, W. D., Widyastuti, Y., Fidriyanto, R., Ridwan, R., Rohmatussolihat, Sari, N. F., Firsoni, & Sugoro, I. (2020) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/439/1/012022 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Xu, D., Han, H., Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Li, F., Huang, W., Gao, L., Na, N., Hao, J., Wang, J., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1185138/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Muruz, H., Selçuk, Z., Salman, M., NUHOĞLU, Z., İsmail, K. A. Y. A., & Çetinkaya, N. (2019) · Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi · doi:10.9775/kvfd.2018.21455
Wei, S. (2020) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Sarturi, J. O. O., Rodrigues, B., Alrumaih, A., Xu, W., Ballou, M., Campanili, P. R. B., & Younker, L. A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4507702
Fancello, F., Spanghero, M., Mastroeni, C., Ghilardelli, F., Catellani, A., Zara, S., Bianco, A., & Gallo, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4592582
Shi, L., & Xia, L. (2024) · Scientific Journal of Technology · doi:10.54691/sx3x0h86
Oh, M., Park, H. S., Choi, B. R., Woo, J. H., Jeong, S. M., Kim, J. H., & Lee, B. H. (2024) · Han-guk choji josaryo hakoeji · doi:10.5333/kgfs.2024.41.1.1
Jatkauskas, J., do Amaral, R. C., Witt, K. L., Joergensen, J. N., Eisner, I., & Vrotniakienė, V. (2025) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation11050293 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hisham, M. B., Hashim, A. M., Hanafi, N. M., Mutalib, N. E. A., & Tan, C. K. (2025) · Malaysian Journal of Science and Advanced Technology · doi:10.56532/mjsat.v5i2.405
Wu, B., Cao, X., Fu, M., Bao, Y., Wu, T., Liu, K., Wen, S., Gao, F., Wang, H., Mei, H., et al. (2025) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy15081888
Modern biotechnology in ensiling
Сhernуuk, S., & Kryzhak, M. (2025) · Tehnologìâ virobnictva ì pererobki produktìv tvarinnictva · doi:10.33245/2310-9289-2025-198-2-61-72
Identification of silage bacterial clusters and analysis of their microecological characteristics
Li, M., Wu, S., & Zi, X. (2026) · Environmental Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40793-026-00891-x
Wu, Q., Du, M., Du, Z., Liu, Z., Jin, X., Zheng, H., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Li, X. L., et al. (2026) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-026-09033-4
- Authors
- Xu, Z., He, H., Zhang, S., & Kong, J.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Kong, Jian
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2017-10-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13614-13614
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5648770
- OpenAlex
- W2763398020
- Semantic Scholar
- 73b28934f7b5cce6a852de22b06a028b7c93246c
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 15.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471715, 31400077)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- silage inoculants, Lactobacillus brevis, corn stover silage, silage fermentation, lactic acid, acetic acid, propylene glycol, lactic acid bacteria, microbial communities, Lactobacillus plantarum, silage quality
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Zea mays, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Silage, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Bioreactors, Acetic Acid, Lactic Acid, Metagenomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review