CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 255Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacterial Counts in Bedding Materials Used on Nine Commercial Dairies

Open access
Hogan, J.S., Smith, K.L., Hoblet, K.H., Todhunter, D.A., Schoenberger, P.S., Hueston, W.D., Pritchard, D.E., Bowman, G.L., Heider, L.E., Brockett, B.L., Conrad, H.R.·1989·Journal of Dairy Science
DOI 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79103-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Bacterial counts were monitored for 1 yr in bedding materials used on nine commercial dairies. Organic materials used to bed lactating cows had significantly higher moisture content and gram-negative bacterial, coliform, Klebsiella species, and streptococcal counts than did inorganic materials. Klebsiella species counts were higher in sawdust than in chopped straw. Streptococcal counts were higher in chopped straw than sawdust. Bacterial counts did not differ between sand and crushed limestone. Gram-negative bacterial and coliform counts were higher during summer and fall than in winter and spring months. Streptococcal counts did not differ among seasons of the year. Linear relationships were significant between total rates of clinical mastitis during lactation and both gram-negative bacterial and Klebsiella species counts in lactating cow bedding. These data indicate that bacterial populations differed between both types of bedding and among seasons of the year. Rates of clinical mastitis were related to bacterial counts in bedding.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79103-7

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–255 of 255

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hogan, J. S., Smith, K. L., Hoblet, K. H., Todhunter, D. A., Schoenberger, P. S., Hueston, W. D., Pritchard, D. E., Bowman, G. L., Heider, L. E., Brockett, B. L., & Conrad, H. R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Publisher
American Dairy Science Association
Published
1989-01
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
250-258
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79103-7
OpenAlex
W2148985898
Cited by
253
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Keywords
dairy cow bedding, bedding materials, bacterial counts, Klebsiella, Gram-negative bacteria, coliform bacteria, Streptococcus, sawdust, sand bedding, crushed limestone, seasonal variation, clinical mastitis, lactating dairy cows
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Dairying, Environmental Microbiology, Female, Housing, Animal, Lactation, Pregnancy, Colony Count, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review