Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Rumen-Undegradable Protein on Dairy Cow Performance: A 12-Year Literature Review

Open access
Santos, F.A.P., Santos, J.E.P., Theurer, C.B., Huber, J.T.·1998·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

In order to integrate and analyze knowledge on the use of protein supplements and protein nutrition of lactating dairy cows, we compiled a review of 108 studies published throughout the world, but principally in the Journal of Dairy Science between 1985 and 1997. In 29 comparisons from 15 metabolism trials, soybean meal was replaced by high amounts of rumen undegradable protein (RUP) as a supplement; the benefits were not consistently observed for flow to the duodenum, essential amino acids, or lysine and methionine. High RUP diets resulted in decreased microbial protein synthesis in 76% of the comparisons. However, fish meal provided a good balance of lysine and methionine when calculated as a percentage of total essential amino acids. In 127 comparisons from 88 lactation trials that were published from 1985 to 1997, researchers studied the effects of replacing soybean meal with high RUP sources, such as heated and chemically treated soybean meal, corn gluten meal, distillers grains, brewers grains, blood meal, meat and bone meal, feather meal, or blends of these sources; milk yield was significantly higher in only 17% of the comparisons. Fish meal and treated soybean meal accounted for most of the positive effects on milk yield from RUP; corn gluten meal resulted in mostly negative results. The percentage of fat in milk was depressed more by fish meal than by other RUP sources. Protein percentage was decreased in 28 comparisons and increased in only 6 comparisons, probably reflecting the decrease in microbial protein synthesis, as was observed for diets high in RUP. The data strongly suggest that increased RUP per se in dairy cow diets, which often results in a decrease in RDP and a change in absorbed AA profiles, does not consistently improve lactational performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75884-9

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Santos, F. A. P., Santos, J. E. P., Theurer, C. B., & Huber, J. T.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1998-12
Volume
81
Issue
12
Pages
3182-3213
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007586965
Cited by
321
References
49
FWCI
22.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Rumen-Undegradable Protein on Dairy Cow Performance: A 12-Year Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75884-9
The paper
Santos, F. A. P., Santos, J. E. P., Theurer, C. B., & Huber, J. T. (1998). Effects of Rumen-Undegradable Protein on Dairy Cow Performance: A 12-Year Literature Review. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75884-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.