Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spontaneous and therapeutic prognostic factors in adult hemispheric World Health Organization Grade II gliomas: a series of 1097 cases: Clinical article

Capelle, Laurent, Fontaine, Denys, Mandonnet, Emmanuel, Taillandier, Luc, Golmard, Jean Louis, Bauchet, Luc, Pallud, Johan, Peruzzi, Philippe, Baron, Marie Hélène, Kujas, Michèle, Guyotat, Jacques, Guillevin, Remi, Frenay, Marc, Taillibert, Sophie, Colin, Philippe, Rigau, Valérie, Vandenbos, Fanny, Pinelli, Catherine, Duffau, Hugues, _, _·2013·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Object: The spontaneous prognostic factors and optimal therapeutic strategy for WHO Grade II gliomas (GIIGs) have yet to be unanimously defined. Specifically, the role of resection is still debated, most notably because the actual amount of resection has seldom been assessed. Methods: Cases of GIIGs treated before December 2007 were extracted from a multicenter database retrospectively collected since January 1985 and prospectively collected since 1996. Inclusion criteria were a patient age ≥ 18 years at diagnosis, histological diagnosis of WHO GIIG, and MRI evaluation of tumor volume at diagnosis and after initial surgery. One thousand ninety-seven lesions were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up was 7.4 years since radiological diagnosis. Factors significant in a univariate analysis (with a p value ≤ 0.1) were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis. Results: At the time of radiological diagnosis, independent spontaneous factors of a poor prognosis were an age ≥ 55 years, an impaired functional status, a tumor location in a nonfrontal area, and, most of all, a larger tumor size. When the study starting point was set at the time of first treatment, independent favorable prognostic factors were limited to a smaller tumor size, an epileptic symptomatology, and a greater extent of resection. Conclusions: This large series with its volumetric assessment refines the prognostic value of previously stressed clinical and radiological parameters and highlights the importance of tumor size and location. The results support additional arguments in favor of the predominant role of resection, in accordance with recently reported experiences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2013.1.jns121

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Capelle, L., Fontaine, D., Mandonnet, E., Taillandier, L., Golmard, J. L., Bauchet, L., Pallud, J., Peruzzi, P., Baron, M. H., Kujas, M., Guyotat, J., Guillevin, R., Frenay, M., Taillibert, S., Colin, P., Rigau, V., Vandenbos, F., Pinelli, C., Duffau, H., & _, _.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2013-06
Volume
118
Issue
6
Pages
1157-1168
ISSN
  • 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0693
OpenAlex
W1608734166
Cited by
422
References
54
FWCI
15.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spontaneous and therapeutic prognostic factors in adult hemispheric World Health Organization Grade II gliomas: a series of 1097 cases: Clinical article. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/2013.1.jns121
The paper
Capelle, L., Fontaine, D., Mandonnet, E., Taillandier, L., Golmard, J. L., Bauchet, L., Pallud, J., Peruzzi, P., Baron, M. H., Kujas, M., Guyotat, J., Guillevin, R., Frenay, M., Taillibert, S., Colin, P., Rigau, V., Vandenbos, F., Pinelli, C., Duffau, H., & _, _. (2013). Spontaneous and therapeutic prognostic factors in adult hemispheric World Health Organization Grade II gliomas: a series of 1097 cases: Clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.1.jns121

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.