Cited by 71Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMeningioma and schwannoma management

Resection of gliomas deemed inoperable by neurosurgeons based on preoperative imaging studies

Southwell, Derek G., Birk, Harjus S., Han, Seunggu J., Li, Jing, Sall, Jeffrey W., Berger, Mitchel S.·2018·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Maximal safe resection is a primary objective in the management of gliomas. Despite this objective, surgeons and referring physicians may, on the basis of radiological studies alone, assume a glioma to be unresectable. Because imaging studies, including functional MRI, may not localize brain functions (such as language) with high fidelity, this simplistic approach may exclude some patients from what could be a safe resection. Intraoperative direct electrical stimulation (DES) allows for the accurate localization of functional areas, thereby enabling maximal resection of tumors, including those that may appear inoperable based solely on radiological studies. In this paper the authors describe the extent of resection (EOR) and functional outcomes following resections of tumors deemed inoperable by referring physicians and neurosurgeons. METHODS The authors retrospectively examined the cases of 58 adult patients who underwent glioma resection within 6 months of undergoing a brain biopsy of the same lesion at an outside hospital. All patients exhibited unifocal supratentorial disease and preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale scores ≥ 70. The EOR and 6-month functional outcomes for this population were characterized. RESULTS Intraoperative DES mapping was performed on 96.6% (56 of 58) of patients. Nearly half of the patients (46.6%, 27 of 58) underwent an awake surgical procedure with DES. Overall, the mean EOR was 87.6% ± 13.6% (range 39.0%-100%). Gross-total resecti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2017.5.jns17166

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common location of "eloquent" brain areas across patients is inaccurate, given functional compensation and individual variation.

    “However, considering the potential for functional compensation and the presence of individual variation, a common location of “eloquent” areas across patients seems inaccurate (Southwell et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Southwell, D. G., Birk, H. S., Han, S. J., Li, J., Sall, J. W., & Berger, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Neurological Surgery and
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, and
Corresponding author
Southwell, Derek G.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2018-09
Volume
129
Issue
3
Pages
567-575
ISSN
  • 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0693
OpenAlex
W2767301253
Cited by
71
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Meningioma and schwannoma management
Keywords
glioma, extent of resection, functional MRI, functional brain mapping, awake craniotomy, language mapping, unresectable tumors, residual neurological deficits, functional outcome, brain biopsy, supratentorial glioma, partial resection, gross total resection, preoperative imaging limitations, functional neurosurgery
MeSH terms
Intersectoral Collaboration, Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glioma, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Supratentorial Neoplasms, Procedural Sedation, Karnofsky Performance Status, Interdisciplinary Communication, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review