Cited by 111Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Focused ultrasound–mediated blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer’s disease: long-term safety, imaging, and cognitive outcomes

Open access
Rezai, Ali R., Ranjan, Manish, Haut, Marc W., Carpenter, Jeffrey, D’Haese, Pierre-François, Mehta, Rashi I., Najib, Umer, Wang, Peng +11 more·2023·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: MRI-guided low-intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) has been shown to reversibly open the blood-brain barrier (BBB), with the potential to deliver therapeutic agents noninvasively to target brain regions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative conditions. Previously, the authors reported the short-term safety and feasibility of FUS BBB opening of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (EC) in patients with AD. Given the need to treat larger brain regions beyond the hippocampus and EC, brain volumes and locations treated with FUS have now expanded. To evaluate any potential adverse consequences of BBB opening on disease progression, the authors report safety, imaging, and clinical outcomes among participants with mild AD at 6–12 months after FUS treatment targeted to the hippocampus, frontal lobe, and parietal lobe. METHODS: In this open-label trial, participants with mild AD underwent MRI-guided FUS sonication to open the BBB in β-amyloid positive regions of the hippocampus, EC, frontal lobe, and parietal lobe. Participants underwent 3 separate FUS treatment sessions performed 2 weeks apart. Outcome assessments included safety, imaging, neurological, cognitive, and florbetaben β-amyloid PET. RESULTS: Ten participants (range 55–76 years old) completed 30 separate FUS treatments at 2 participating institutions, with 6–12 months of follow-up. All participants had immediate BBB opening after FUS and BBB closure within 24–48 hours. All FUS treatments were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events related to the procedure. All 10 participants had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, and 7 participants had a follow-up out to 1 year. Changes in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive and Mini-Mental State Examination scores were comparable to those in controls from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. PET scans demonstrated an average β-amyloid plaque of 14% in the Centiloid scale in the FUS-treated regions. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest cohort of participants with mild AD who received FUS treatment, and has the longest follow-up to date. Safety was demonstrated in conjunction with reversible and repeated BBB opening in multiple cortical and deep brain locations, with a concomitant reduction of β-amyloid. There was no apparent cognitive worsening beyond expectations up to 1 year after FUS treatment, suggesting that the BBB opening treatment in multiple brain regions did not adversely influence AD progression. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings. FUS offers a unique opportunity to decrease amyloid plaque burden as well as the potential to deliver targeted therapeutics to multiple brain regions in patients with neurodegenerative disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2022.9.jns221565

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rezai, A. R., Ranjan, M., Haut, M. W., Carpenter, J., D’Haese, P.-F., Mehta, R. I., Najib, U., Wang, P., Claassen, D. O., Chazen, J. L., Krishna, V., Deib, G., Zibly, Z., Hodder, S. L., Wilhelmsen, K. C., Finomore, V., Konrad, P. E., Kaplitt, M., & _, _.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Neurosurgery,
  • Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry,
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Neurology, and
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Departments of Radiology and
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Neurosciences,
  • Neurological Surgery (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2023-07-01
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
275-283
ISSN
  • 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0693
OpenAlex
W4308174390
Cited by
111
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 13
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104942)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
low-intensity focused ultrasound, blood-brain barrier opening, Alzheimer's disease, mild Alzheimer's disease, long-term safety, amyloid plaques, Centiloid scale, cognitive outcomes, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, MRI-guided ultrasound, disease progression
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Middle Aged, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review