The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Excitatory amino acids in cerebrospinal fluid following traumatic brain injury in humans
Abstract
✓ Evidence from models of traumatic brain injury implicates excitotoxicity as an integral process in the ultimate neuronal damage that follows. Concentrations of the excitatory amino acid glutamate were serially measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with traumatic brain injuries and in control patients for comparison. The purpose of the study was to determine whether glutamate concentrations were significantly elevated following traumatic brain injury and, if so, whether they were elevated in a time frame that would allow the use of antagonist therapy. Cerebrospinal fluid was sampled fresh from ventricular drains every 12 hours and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography for the excitatory amino acids. The peak concentrations of glutamate in the CSF of the 12 brain-injured patients ranged from 14 to 474 µM and were significantly higher than those in the three control patients, 4.9 to 17 µM (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.02). Glutamate concentrations in five of the eight patients who were still being sampled on Day 3 were beyond the control group range. The implication of this study is that severely head-injured patients are exposed to high concentrations of a neurotoxic amino acid for days following injury and thus may benefit from antagonist intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
The Role of Excitatory Amino Acids and NMDA Receptors in Traumatic Brain Injury
Faden, A. I., Demediuk, P., Panter, S. S., & Vink, R. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2567056 · Cited by 1,508
Cited by
Danbolt, N. C. (2001) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00067-8 · Cited by 4,227
The far-reaching scope of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury
Simon, D. W., McGeachy, M. J., Bayır, H., Clark, R. S. B., Loane, D. J., & Kochanek, P. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.13 · Cited by 1,190
Noninvasive brain stimulation in traumatic brain injury
Demirtas-Tatlidede, A., Vahabzadeh-Hagh, A. M., Bernabeu, M., Tormos, J. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2012) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e318217df55 · Cited by 149
Stone, J. R., Singleton, R. H., & Povlishock, J. T. (2000) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02485-9 · Cited by 132
Tremblay, S., de Beaumont, L., Lassonde, M., & Théoret, H. (2011) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1615 · Cited by 86
Ruban, A., Cohen-Kashi Malina, K., Cooper, I., Graubardt, N., Babakin, L., Jona, G., & Teichberg, V. I. (2015) · Neurodegenerative Diseases · doi:10.1159/000382034 · Cited by 39
Leibowitz, A., Klin, Y., Gruenbaum, B., Gruenbaum, S., Kuts, R., Dubilet, M., Ohayon, S., Boyko, M., Sheiner, E., Shapira, Y., et al. (2012) · Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis · doi:10.55782/ane-2012-1910 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, A. J., Moulton, R. J., MacMillan, V. H., & Shedden, P. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 369-372
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026022416
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.