The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stent-Supported Aneurysm Coiling: A Literature Survey of Treatment and Follow-Up
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stent-supported aneurysm coiling has been utilized with increasing frequency over the past few years, particularly for addressing treatment of complex and wide-neck aneurysms. A sizable body of literature describing various experiences with stent-supported coiling now exists. The purpose of this research was to carry out a comprehensive literature survey of stent-supported aneurysm coiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of papers reporting results with stent-assisted aneurysm coiling through January 2011 was conducted to identify the prevalence of stent-related and other complications, occlusion rates, and clinical and angiographic follow-up data. RESULTS: Thirty-nine articles with 1517 patients met inclusion criteria for initial analysis, follow-up analysis, or both. Overall, 9% of cases were confounded by a technical stent-related issue, including 4% failure of deployment. The overall procedure complication rate was 19%, with periprocedural mortality of 2.1%. Approximately 45% of aneurysms were completely occluded at first treatment session, increasing to 61% on follow-up. Approximately 3.5% in-stent stenosis and 0.6% stent occlusion were observed at angiographic follow-up. Delayed stroke or transient ischemic attack was reported in 3% of subjects. Within a subset of articles, the incidence of stent-related issues in the first 10 patients was significantly higher than in subsequent subjects, supporting the notion of a procedural "learning curve." CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, the morbidity of stent-supported coiling is somewhat higher compared with "traditional" coiling. As might be expected, execution of the procedure appears improved with experience. Complete occlusion rates remain somewhat low. More and longer term angiographic follow-up information is needed to understand delayed stent-related issues and to better define the durability of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yu, K. J., Kuzum, D., Hwang, S.-W., Kim, B. H., Juul, H., Kim, N. H., Won, S. M., Chiang, K., Trumpis, M., Richardson, A. G., et al. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4624 · Cited by 523
Becske, T., Brinjikji, W., Potts, M. B., Kallmes, D. F., Shapiro, M., Moran, C. J., Levy, E. I., McDougall, C. G., Szikora, I., Lanzino, G., et al. (2017) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 · Cited by 447
Self-citationSarrami-Foroushani, A., Lassila, T., MacRaild, M., Asquith, J., Roes, K. C. B., Byrne, J. V., & Frangi, A. F. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23998-w · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, M., Becske, T., Sahlein, D., Babb, J., & Nelson, P. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Published
- 2011-10-27
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-163
- ISSN
- 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-959X
- OpenAlex
- W2169489540
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stent-Supported Aneurysm Coiling: A Literature Survey of Treatment and Follow-Up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3174/ajnr.a2719
- The paper
- Shapiro, M., Becske, T., Sahlein, D., Babb, J., & Nelson, P. K. (2012). Stent-Supported Aneurysm Coiling: A Literature Survey of Treatment and Follow-Up. American Journal of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a2719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.