The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects
Abstract
Business school faculty have been placing students into teams for group projects for many years, with mixed results. Obvious benefits accrue in using teams, but so do numerous problems. One of the main issues is that many business faculty often place students in teams with little or no guidance on how teams properly function. In this article, the author synthesizes a detailed review of the literature on teams and teamwork, examining the benefits and problems of using student teams and then suggests processes business faculty can put in place to maximize the benefits of group projects, while minimizing the problems. A preliminary study of student perceptions of team projects is also included in this review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977) · Group & Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/105960117700200404 · Cited by 2,679
Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works?
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091389809602629 · Cited by 1,011
Cited by
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Education for Business
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-19
- ISSN
- 0883-2323 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-3356
- OpenAlex
- W2032777240
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3200/joeb.82.1.11-19
- The paper
- Hansen, R. S. (2006). Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects. Journal of Education for Business. https://doi.org/10.3200/joeb.82.1.11-19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.