Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Academic Performance and Cheating: Moderating Role of School Identification and Self-Efficacy

Finn, Kristin Voelkl, Frone, Michael R.·2004·The Journal of Educational Research

Abstract

Academic dishonesty is a significant problem among students from elementary school through college. The desire to succeed in school through dishonesty is increased when there is a breakdown in the norms associated with conventional academic attitudes. The authors conducted a survey research study to examine the relationship between academic performance and cheating. They hypothesized that the inverse relationship between academic performance and cheating is moderated by school identification and academic self-efficacy. The results show that cheating is more likely among lower achieving students when they do not identify with school, and among higher achieving students with low levels of academic self-efficacy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/joer.97.3.115-121

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84-93. · DOI
  2. Bushway, A., & Nash, W. R. (1977). School cheating behavior. Review of Educational Research, 47, 623-632. · DOI
  3. Calabrese, R. L., & Cochran, J. T. (1990). The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 65-72.
  4. Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143-178. · DOI
  5. G. J. Cizek, (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. · DOI
  6. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16-20. · DOI
  7. Dornbusch, S. M., Herman, M. R., & Morley, J. A. (1996). Domains of adolescent achievement. In G. R. Adams, R. Montemayor, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence (pp. 181-231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  8. E. D. Evans, D. Craig, (1990). Teacher and student perceptions of academic cheating in middle and senior high schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 84, 44-52. · DOI
  9. Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79-90. · DOI
  10. Harter, S. (1990). Self and identity development. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 352-387). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  11. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  12. Jendrek, M. P. (1992). Students' reaction to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 33(3), 260-273.
  13. Kulka, R. A., Mann, D. W., & Klingel, D. M. (1980). A person-environment fit model of school crime and disruption. In K. Baker & R. J. Rubel (Eds.), Violence and crime in the schools. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
  14. Leming, J. S. (1980). Cheating behavior, subject variables, and components of the internal-external scale under high and low risk conditions. The Journal of Educational Research, 74, 83-87. · DOI
  15. Liska, A. E., & Reed, M. D. (1985). Ties to conventional institutions and delinquency: Estimating reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review, 50, 547-560. · DOI
  16. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 870-885.
  18. Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 96-115. · DOI
  19. Newmann, F. M. (1981). Reducing student alienation in high schools: Implications and theory. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 546-564. · DOI
  20. Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229-241. · DOI
  21. Race for best scores fueling adult deceptions-critics. (June 8, 2000). Associated Press. [On-line]. Retrieved from: www.msnbc.com
  22. M. L. Riggs, J. Warka, B. Babasa, R. Betancourt, S. Hooker, (1994). Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 793-802. · DOI
  23. Roig, M., & Neaman, M. (1994). Alienation, learning or grade orientation, and achievement as correlates of attitudes toward cheating. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 1096-1098. · DOI
  24. Sauley, K. S., & Bedeian, A. G. (1989). .05: A case of the tail wagging the distribution. Journal of Management, 15, 335-344. · DOI
  25. Vallacher, R. R., & Solodky, (1979). Objective self-awareness, standards of evaluation, and moral behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 254-262. · DOI
  26. Voelkl, K. E. (1996). Measuring students' identification with school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 760-770. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 294-318. · DOI
  28. Voelkl, K. E., & Frone, M. R. (2000). Predictors of substance use at school among high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 583-592. · DOI
  29. Whitley, B. E., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41, 657-680. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R.
Venue
The Journal of Educational Research
Published
2004-01
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
115-121
ISSN
  • 0022-0671
  • 1940-0675
Cited by
175
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Academic Performance and Cheating: Moderating Role of School Identification and Self-Efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3200/joer.97.3.115-121
The paper
Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic Performance and Cheating: Moderating Role of School Identification and Self-Efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.97.3.115-121