Cited by 345Infection Control and VentilationInfection Control in HealthcareSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

SARS among Critical Care Nurses, Toronto

Open access
Loeb, Mark, McGeer, Allison, Henry, Bonnie, Ofner, Marianna, Rose, David, Hlywka, Tammy, Levie, Joanne, McQueen, Jane +5 more·2004·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

To determine factors that predispose or protect healthcare workers from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), we conducted a retrospective cohort study among 43 nurses who worked in two Toronto critical care units with SARS patients. Eight of 32 nurses who entered a SARS patient's room were infected. The probability of SARS infection was 6% per shift worked. Assisting during intubation, suctioning before intubation, and manipulating the oxygen mask were high-risk activities. Consistently wearing a mask (either surgical or particulate respirator type N95) while caring for a SARS patient was protective for the nurses, and consistent use of the N95 mask was more protective than not wearing a mask. Risk was reduced by consistent use of a surgical mask, but not significantly. Risk was lower with consistent use of a N95 mask than with consistent use of a surgical mask. We conclude that activities related to intubation increase SARS risk and use of a mask (particularly a N95 mask) is protective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid1002.030838

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loeb, M., McGeer, A., Henry, B., Ofner, M., Rose, D., Hlywka, T., Levie, J., McQueen, J., Smith, S., Moss, L., Smith, A., Green, K., & Walter, S. D.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • Toronto Public Health (CA)
  • Health Canada (CA)
  • Scarborough Grace Hospital, Ontario, Canada
  • McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Corresponding author
Loeb, Mark
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-02
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
251-255
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W1973418860
Cited by
345
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
14.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McMaster University
  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
SARS, intensive care unit nurses, occupational infection risk, healthcare worker infection, N95 respirators, surgical masks, personal protective equipment, intubation, aerosol-generating procedures, infection control
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Male, Masks, Nurses, Occupational Diseases, Ontario, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Occupational Exposure, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review