Cited by 321Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesInfectious Diseases and Mycology

Invasive Non- Aspergillus Mold Infections in Transplant Recipients, United States, 2001–2006

Open access
Park, Benjamin J., Pappas, Peter G., Wannemuehler, Kathleen A., Alexander, Barbara D., Anaissie, Elias J., Andes, David R., Baddley, John W., Brown, Janice M. +17 more·2011·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Recent reports describe increasing incidence of non-Aspergillus mold infections in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. To investigate the epidemiology of infections with Mucorales, Fusarium spp., and Scedosporium spp. molds, we analyzed data from the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network, 23 transplant centers that conducted prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections during 2001-2006. We identified 169 infections (105 Mucorales, 37 Fusarium spp., and 27 Scedosporium spp.) in 169 patients; 124 (73.4%) were in HCT recipients, and 45 (26.6%) were in SOT recipients. The crude 90-day mortality rate was 56.6%. The 12-month mucormycosis cumulative incidence was 0.29% for HCT and 0.07% for SOT. Mucormycosis incidence among HCT recipients varied widely, from 0.08% to 0.69%, with higher incidence in cohorts receiving transplants during 2003 and 2004. Non-Aspergillus mold infections continue to be associated with high mortality rates. The incidence of mucormycosis in HCT recipients increased substantially during the surveillance period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid1710.110087

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among transplant recipients in the US who developed mucormycosis, white race was predominant (90.5%).

    “Among transplant recipients in the US who developed mucormycosis, white race was predominant (90.5%) [96]”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [96]

  • Among transplant recipients in the US, the vast majority developing fusariosis (94.4%) or scedosporiosis (91.3%) were white.

    “Among transplant recipients in the US, the vast majority developing fusariosis (94.4%) or scedosporiosis (91.3%) were white [96].”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [96]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, B. J., Pappas, P. G., Wannemuehler, K. A., Alexander, B. D., Anaissie, E. J., Andes, D. R., Baddley, J. W., Brown, J. M., Brumble, L. M., Freifeld, A. G., Hadley, S., Herwaldt, L., Ito, J. I., Kauffman, C. A., Lyon, G. M., Marr, K. A., Morrison, V. A., Papanicolaou, G., Patterson, T. F., Perl, T. M., Schuster, M. G., Walker, R., Wingard, J. R., Walsh, T. J., & Kontoyiannis, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Park, Benjamin J.
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2011-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1855-1864
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2142544148
Cited by
321
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Enzon Pharmaceuticals
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01CI000286, 5u01ci000286-05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Infectious Diseases and Mycology
Keywords
mucormycosis, Mucorales, Fusarium, Scedosporium, hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, solid organ transplant recipients, invasive fungal infections, mortality, incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Antifungal Agents, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mycoses, Opportunistic Infections, Transplantation, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review