Cited by 20Nursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationElectronic Health Records Systems

Advancing Nursing Informatics in the Next Decade: Recommendations from an International Survey

Open access
Topaz Maxim, Ronquillo Charlene, Peltonen Laura-Maria, Pruinelli Lisiane, Sarmiento Raymond Francis, Badger Martha K., Ali Samira, Lewis Adrienne +9 more·2016·Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Abstract

In the summer of 2015, the International Medical Informatics Association Nursing Informatics Special Interest Group (IMIA NISIG) Student Working Group developed and distributed an international survey of current and future trends in nursing informatics. The survey was developed based on current literature on nursing informatics trends and translated into six languages. Respondents were from 31 different countries in Asia, Africa, North and Central America, South America, Europe, and Australia. This paper presents the results of responses to the survey question: "What should be done (at a country or organizational level) to advance nursing informatics in the next 5-10 years?" (n responders = 272). Using thematic qualitative analysis, responses were grouped into five key themes: 1) Education and training; 2) Research; 3) Practice; 4) Visibility; and 5) Collaboration and integration. We also provide actionable recommendations for advancing nursing informatics in the next decade.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/978-1-61499-658-3-123

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. M. Rutherford, "Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice? " OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2008 Vol. 13 No. 1.
  2. K.H. Bowles, J. Chittams, E. Heil, M. Topaz, K. Rickard, et al. Successful electronic implementation of discharge referral decision support has a positive impact on 30-and 60-day readmissions. Res Nurs Health. 2015 Apr;38(2):102-14.
  3. E.M. Borycki, N. Frisch, J. Moreau, A.W. Kushniruk, Integration of Electronic Health Records into Nursing Education: Issues, Challenges and Limitations. In KL Courtney, et al. (Eds.), Driving Quality in Informatics: Fulfilling the Promise. IOS Press, 2016.
  4. S. Lee, Features of computerized clinical decision support systems supportive of nursing practice: a literature review. Comput Inform Nurs. 2013 Oct;31(10):477-95; quiz 496-7.
  5. M. Topaz, C. Ronquillo, L. Pruinelli, R. Ramos, L.M. Peltonen, et al. Central trends in nursing informatics: students' reflections from International Congress on Nursing Informatics 2014 (Taipei, Taiwan). Comput Inform Nurs. 2015 Mar;33(3):85-9.
  6. V.K. Saba, K. McCormick K, Essentials of Nursing Informatics, 6 th Ed, McGraw-Hill Education, USA, 2015.
  7. M. Vaismoradi. M, H.Turunen, T. Bondas, Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405.
  8. K. Hunter, D. McGonigle, T. Hebda, The integration of informatics content in baccalaureate and graduate nursing education: a status report. Nurse Educ. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):110-3.
  9. S. Bakken, P.W. Stone, E.L. Larson, A nursing informatics research agenda for 2008-18: Contextual influences and key components. Nurs Outlook. 2008;56:206-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maxim, T., Charlene, R., Laura-Maria, P., Lisiane, P., Francis, S. R., Badger Martha, K., Samira, A., Adrienne, L., Mattias, G., Eunjoo, J., Tayaben Jude, L., Chiu-Hsiang, K., Tasneem, I., Janine, S., Hyunggu, J., Jacklin, E. G., & Dari, A.
Affiliations
  • Carlow University (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Tzu Chi University (TW)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2016
Volume
225
Pages
123-7
ISSN
0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2357570379
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.36
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
nursing informatics, future trends, international survey, nursing education, nursing research, nursing practice
MeSH terms
Forecasting, Health Promotion, Health Services Research, Nursing Research, Health Care Surveys, Internationality, Nursing Informatics, Practice Patterns, Nurses'

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review