Cited by 20Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

All is not lost: positive behaviors in Alzheimer’s disease and behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia with disease severity

Open access
Midorikawa, Akira, Leyton, Cristian E., Foxe, David, Landin-Romero, Ramon, Hodges, John R., Piguet, Olivier·2016·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal evidence indicates that some patients with dementia exhibit novel or increased positive behaviors, such as painting or singing, after the disease onset. Due to the lack of objective measures, however, the frequency and nature of these changes has not been formally investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically identify changes in these behaviors in the two most common younger-onset dementia syndromes: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). METHODS: Sixty-three caregivers of patients with dementia (32 caregivers of AD patients and 31 caregivers of bvFTD patients) participated in the study. Caregivers rated the presence and frequency of positive and negative behavior changes after the onset of dementia using the Hypersensory and Social/Emotional Scale (HSS) questionnaire, focusing on three domains: sensory processing, cognitive skills, and social/emotional processing. Six composites scores were obtained reflecting these three domains (two composite scores for each domain). Differences across scores and ratios of increased and decreased behaviors were analyzed between AD and bvFTD, at different disease severity levels. RESULTS: After disease onset, significant changes in the sensory processing domain were observed across disease severity levels, particularly in AD. Composite scores of the other domains did not change significantly. Importantly, however, some novel or increased positive behaviors were present in between 10% (Music activities) and 70% (Hypersensitivity) of AD and bvFTD patients, regardless of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: We provide the first systematic investigation of positive behaviors in AD and bvFTD. The newly developed HSS questionnaire is a valid measure to characterize changes and progression of positive behaviors in patients with dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-160440

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disease progression in bvFTD has been associated with various behavioral changes, from an increase in core features to specific changes, that correlate with FTD-specific progression measures.

    “Disease progression in bvFTD has been associated with various behavioral changes, from an increase in core features, e.g., decreased socio-emotional abilities and increased multi-dimensional apathy, to specific changes, e.g., increased fat preference and hypersensitivity to loud noises (Midorikawa et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2020; Ahmed et al., 2021; Foster et al., 2022), that correlate with FTD-s”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Midorikawa, A., Leyton, C. E., Foxe, D., Landin-Romero, R., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O.
Affiliations
  • Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (AU)
  • Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Midorikawa, Akira
  • Piguet, Olivier
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2016-09-06
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
549-558
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2476728002
Cited by
20
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chuo University
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1037746)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K04191, 16H01517)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
MeSH terms
Optimism, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Caregivers, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review