Cited by 143

MicroRNA profile in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: analysis of miR-9-5p and miR-598 in raw and exosome enriched cerebrospinal fluid samples

Riancho, Javier, Vázquez-Higuera, José Luis, Pozueta, Ana, Lage, Carmen, Kazimierczak, Martha, Bravo, María, Calero, Miguel, Gonalezález, Andrea +3 more·2017·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Background MicroRNAs have been postulated as potential biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Exosomes are nanovesicles which transport microRNAs, proteins, and other cargos. It has been hypothesized that the exosome traffic might be increased in neurodegenerative disorders. Objective i) To assess the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) microRNA profile in a group of AD patients and control subjects and to validate a group of microRNAs previously reported by other authors. ii) To compare microRNA levels in whole CSF and in the exosome-enriched fraction in AD patients. Methods A panel of 760 microRNAs was analyzed in the CSF of 10 AD patients and 10 healthy subjects. Among microRNAs differently expressed, we selected those that had been previously reported by other authors. Candidates were validated in a larger group by individual qPCR assays. MicroRNA expression was also evaluated in exosome-enriched CSF samples of patients with AD and controls. Results Fifteen microRNAs were differently expressed in AD. MiR-9-5p, miR-134, and miR-598 were selected as candidates for further analysis. MiR-9-5p and miR-598 were detected in 50 and 75% of control CSF samples, respectively, while they were not detected in any AD CSF samples. We observed an opposite pattern when we evaluated the microRNA expression in the exosome-enriched CSF AD samples. No pattern variations were noted among healthy subjects. Conclusion These data propose miR-9-5p and miR-598 as potential biomarkers for AD. Further studie…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-161179

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • miR-9-5p and miR-598 are depleted in whole CSF from AD patients but enriched in exosome-enriched CSF fractions.

    “In one study, Riancho and colleagues demonstrated that miR-9-5p and miR-598 are depleted in whole CSF from AD patients but enriched in exosome-enriched CSF fractions, underscoring how EV trafficking and subfraction choice can profoundly influence biomarker readouts (Riancho et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riancho, J., Vázquez-Higuera, J. L., Pozueta, A., Lage, C., Kazimierczak, M., Bravo, M., Calero, M., Gonalezález, A., Rodríguez, E., Lleó, A., & Sánchez-Juan, P.
Affiliations
  • Service of Neurology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla –IDIVAL; CIBERNED, Santander, Spain
  • CIBERNED; National Institute of Health Carlos III; Alzheimer Disease Research Unit, CIEN Foundation; Queen Sofia Foundation Alzheimer Center; Chronic Disease Programme Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
  • Department of Neurology, Memory Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERNED.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2017-03-21
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
483-491
ISSN
  • 1387-2877
  • 1875-8908
Cited by
143
References
4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review