Cited by 104Neurological disorders and treatmentsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting the Fornix for Mild Alzheimer Dementia (the ADvance Trial): A Two Year Follow-up Including Results of Delayed Activation

Open access
Leoutsakos, Jeannie-Marie S., Yan, Haijuan, Anderson, William S., Asaad, Wael F., Baltuch, Gordon, Burke, Anna, Chakravarty, M. Mallar, Drake, Kristen E. +19 more·2018·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given recent challenges in developing new treatments for Alzheimer dementia (AD), it is vital to explore alternate treatment targets, such as neuromodulation for circuit dysfunction. We previously reported an exploratory Phase IIb double-blind trial of deep brain stimulation targeting the fornix (DBS-f) in mild AD (the ADvance trial). We reported safety but no clinical benefits of DBS-f versus the delayed-on (sham) treatment in 42 participants after one year. However, secondary post hoc analyses of the one-year data suggested a possible DBS-f benefit for participants≥65 years. OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term safety and clinical effects of sustained and delayed-on DBS-f treatment of mild AD after two years. METHODS: 42 participants underwent implantation of DBS-f electrodes, with half randomized to active DBS-f stimulation (early on) for two years and half to delayed-on (sham) stimulation after 1 year to provide 1 year of active DBS-f stimulation (delayed on). We evaluated safety and clinical outcomes over the two years of the trial. RESULTS: DBS-f had a favorable safety profile with similar rates of adverse events across both trial phases (years 1 and 2) and between treatment arms. There were no differences between treatment arms on any primary clinical outcomes. However, post-hoc age group analyses suggested a possible benefit among older (>65) participants. CONCLUSION: DBS-f was safe. Additional study of mechanisms of action and methods for titrating stimulation parameters will be needed to determine if DBS has potential as an AD treatment. Future efficacy studies should focus on patients over age 65.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-180121

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a phase II study with 2 years of follow-up on mild AD patients, DBS targeting the fornix was safe and well tolerated but with no clinical benefits.

    “Even if in several murine models, DBS has been shown to improve visual-spatial memory, in a phase II study with 2 years of follow-up on mild AD patients, DBS targeting the fornix was safe and well tolerated but with no clinical benefits [197].”

    From Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Beyond Symptomatic Therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [197]

    The Discussion reports a favorable safety profile over two years and no differences between treatment arms on primary clinical outcomes. But “no clinical benefits” is too categorical: the study was not powered to assess efficacy, and post-hoc analyses suggested a possible benefit in participants over 65 (Discussion; page numbers not provided). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Holroyd K, Fosdick L, Smith G, Leoutsakos J (2015) Deep brain stimulation targeting the fornix for mild Alzheimer dementia. Access Journal of …. PMC6518401 29914028

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leoutsakos, J.-M. S., Yan, H., Anderson, W. S., Asaad, W. F., Baltuch, G., Burke, A., Chakravarty, M. M., Drake, K. E., Foote, K. D., Fosdick, L., Giacobbe, P., Mari, Z., McAndrews, M. P., Munro, C. A., Oh, E. S., Okun, M. S., Pendergrass, J. C., Ponce, F. A., Rosenberg, P. B., Sabbagh, M. N., Salloway, S., Tang-Wai, D. F., Targum, S. D., Wolk, D., Lozano, A. M., Smith, G. S., & Lyketsos, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Functional Neuromodulation Ltd, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Clintara LLC, Boston, MA, USA
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
  • Departments of Medicine (Neurology), Surgery (Neurosurgery) Psychologyand Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Corresponding author
Leoutsakos, Jeannie-Marie S.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2018-06-19
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
597-606
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2808280305
Cited by
104
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG042165, P50AG005146)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR014852)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS096008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, fornix
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Fornix, Brain, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review