Cited by 37Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Services Management and Policy

Dementia primary prevention policies and strategies and their local implementation: A scoping review using England as a case study

Open access
Collins, Rachel, Silarova, Barbora, Clare, Linda·2019·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the policy context and how policy is implemented at the local and clinical level is an important precursor to developing preventive strategies focusing on dementia risk reduction in primary healthcare settings. OBJECTIVE: Using England as a case study, we review policies and strategies relevant to dementia prevention from the national to local level and how these are translated into primary healthcare services. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review covering: 1) identification of national, regional, and local policies and strategies that include dementia prevention; 2) identification of national guidelines for implementing dementia prevention at the clinical level; and 3) evaluation of the implementation of these at the clinical level. RESULTS: Dementia prevention is addressed in national policy, and this filters through to regional and local levels. Focus on dementia prevention is limited and variable. Reference to modifiable risk factors is associated with other non-communicable diseases, placing less emphasis on factors more dementia specific. Evidence of implementation of dementia prevention policies at the clinical level is limited and inconsistent. Available evidence suggests messages about dementia prevention may best be delivered through primary healthcare services such as the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check. CONCLUSION: The limitations identified in this review could be addressed through development of a national policy focused specifically on dementia prevention. This could provide a platform for increasing knowledge and understanding among the general population and healthcare professionals. It would be important for such a policy to cover the full range of modifiable risk factors relevant to dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-180608

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was a tendency for the included guidelines to focus on risk factors common to other noncommunicable diseases, thereby overlooking risk factors such as low mental and social activity.

    “As in an earlier review of dementia risk reduction guidelines [35], there was a tendency for guidelines to focus on risk factors that were common to other noncommunicable diseases, thereby overlooking risk factors such as low mental and social activity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Dodson EA, Brownson RC, Weiss SW (2012) Policy dissemination research. In Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice, Brownson R, Colditz G, Proctor EK, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, R., Silarova, B., & Clare, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health (REACH), University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
Corresponding author
Collins, Rachel
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2018-11-28
Volume
70
Issue
s1
Pages
S303-S318
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2903333230
Cited by
37
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0616-10088)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
dementia prevention
MeSH terms
Dementia, England, Health Policy, Humans, Primary Health Care, Primary Prevention, State Medicine, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review