Cited by 51Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchVoice and Speech DisordersNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Automatic Subtyping of Individuals with Primary Progressive Aphasia

Open access
Themistocleous, Charalambos, Ficek, Bronte, Webster, Kimberly, den Ouden, Dirk-Bart, Hillis, Argye E., Tsapkini, Kyrana·2021·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The classification of patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) into variants is time-consuming, costly, and requires combined expertise by clinical neurologists, neuropsychologists, speech pathologists, and radiologists. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to determine whether acoustic and linguistic variables provide accurate classification of PPA patients into one of three variants: nonfluent PPA, semantic PPA, and logopenic PPA. METHODS: In this paper, we present a machine learning model based on deep neural networks (DNN) for the subtyping of patients with PPA into three main variants, using combined acoustic and linguistic information elicited automatically via acoustic and linguistic analysis. The performance of the DNN was compared to the classification accuracy of Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, and Decision Trees, as well as to expert clinicians' classifications. RESULTS: The DNN model outperformed the other machine learning models as well as expert clinicians' classifications with 80% classification accuracy. Importantly, 90% of patients with nfvPPA and 95% of patients with lvPPA was identified correctly, providing reliable subtyping of these patients into their corresponding PPA variants. CONCLUSION: We show that the combined speech and language markers from connected speech productions can inform variant subtyping in patients with PPA. The end-to-end automated machine learning approach we present can enable clinicians and researchers to provide an easy, quick, and inexpensive classification of patients with PPA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-201101

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Fraser KC, Lundholm Fors K, Eckerström M, Themistocleous C, Kokkinakis D (2018) Improving the Sensitivity and Specificity of MCI Screening with Linguistic Information. Proceedings of the LREC 2018 Workshop “Resources and ProcessIng of linguistic, para-linguistic and extra-linguistic Data from people with various forms of cognitive/psychiatric impairments (RaPID-2)”, pp. 19– 26.
  2. [11]Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B (2001) BDAE-3: Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination–Third Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia, PA.
  3. [23]Wilson AC, Roelofs R, Stern M, Srebro N, Recht B (2017) The marginal value of adaptive gradient methods in machine learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. Curran Associates, Inc., pp. 4148– 4158.
  4. [25]Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Ghemawat S, Goodfellow IJ, Harp A, Irving G, Isard M, Jia Y, Józefowicz R, Kaiser L, Kudlur M, Levenberg J, Mané D, Monga R, Moore S, Murray DG, Olah C, Schuster M, Shlens J, Steiner B, Sutskever I, Talwar K, Tucker PA, Vanhoucke V, Vasudevan V, Viégas FB, Vinyals O, Warden P, Wattenberg M, Wicke M, Yu Y, Zheng X (2016) Ten-sorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI ‘16), Savannah, GA. https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi16/technical-sessions/presentation/abadi, pp 265– 283

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Themistocleous, C., Ficek, B., Webster, K., den Ouden, D.-B., Hillis, A. E., & Tsapkini, K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
Corresponding author
Themistocleous, Charalambos
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
1185-1194
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W3119573264
Cited by
51
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Science of Learning Institute, Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG066507)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC014475)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
primary progressive aphasia
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Acoustics, Aged, Decision Trees, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Models, Theoretical, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Primary Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review