Cited by 19Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and Disorders

Discriminating nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic PPA variants with automatically extracted morphosyntactic measures from connected speech

Open access
Lukic, Sladjana, Fan, Zekai, García, Adolfo M., Welch, Ariane E., Ratnasiri, Buddhika M., Wilson, Stephen M., Henry, Maya L., Vonk, Jet +5 more·2024·Cortex

Abstract

Morphosyntactic assessments are important for characterizing individuals with nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). Yet, standard tests are subject to examiner bias and often fail to differentiate between nfvPPA and logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA). Moreover, relevant neural signatures remain underexplored. Here, we leverage natural language processing tools to automatically capture morphosyntactic disturbances and their neuroanatomical correlates in 35 individuals with nfvPPA relative to 10 healthy controls (HC) and 26 individuals with lvPPA. Participants described a picture, and ensuing transcripts were analyzed via part-of-speech tagging to extract sentence-related features (e.g., subordinating and coordinating conjunctions), verbal-related features (e.g., tense markers), and nominal-related features (e.g., subjective and possessive pronouns). Gradient boosting machines were used to classify between groups using all features. We identified the most discriminant morphosyntactic marker via a feature importance algorithm and examined its neural correlates via voxel-based morphometry. Individuals with nfvPPA produced fewer morphosyntactic elements than the other two groups. Such features robustly discriminated them from both individuals with lvPPA and HCs with an AUC of .95 and .82, respectively. The most discriminatory feature corresponded to subordinating conjunctions was correlated with cortical atrophy within the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus across groups (p FWE < .05). Automated morphosyntactic analysis can efficiently differentiate nfvPPA from lvPPA. Also, the most sensitive morphosyntactic markers correlate with a core atrophy region of nfvPPA. Our approach, thus, can contribute to a key challenge in PPA diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.013

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acoustic features in Alzheimer's disease may include slower articulation rate, increased pauses, and reduced prosody, though these are typically more subtle than in disorders with prominent motor speech involvement such as Parkinson's disease or nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia, which is additionally marked by agrammatism.

    “Acoustic features in AD may include slower articulation rate, increased pauses, and reduced prosody,86 though these are typically more subtle than in disorders with prominent motor speech involvement, such as Parkinson’s disease87 or the nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), which is additionally marked by agrammatism.88”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Berndt RS, Wayland S, Rochon E, Saffran EM, & Schwartz MF (2000). Quantitative production analysis: A training manual for the analysis of aphasic sentence production. Hove, East Sussex UK: Psychology Press
  2. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, & Weintraub S (2001). BDAE: The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  3. Honnibal M, & Montani I (2017). spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with Bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing. To appear, 7(1), 411– 420.
  4. LeDell E, & Poirier S (2020, July). H2o automl: Scalable automatic machine learning. In Proceedings of the AutoML Workshop at ICML (Vol. 2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lukic, S., Fan, Z., García, A. M., Welch, A. E., Ratnasiri, B. M., Wilson, S. M., Henry, M. L., Vonk, J., Deleon, J., Miller, B. L., Miller, Z., Mandelli, M. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL)
  • Adelphi University (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Lukic, Sladjana
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
173
Pages
34-48
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391430792
Cited by
19
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (SG-20-725707-ReDLat, 20-725707, SG-20- 725707, UK-22-865742, GBHI ALZ UK-22-865742, P50 AG023501, ALZ UK-22-865742)
  • Universidad de Santiago de Chile
  • Global Brain Health Institute (UK-22-865742)
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (1210195, 1210176)
  • National Institutes of Health (AG023501, NIA P01 AG019724), AG019724, NIA P50AG023501, NS050915)
  • National Institute on Aging (1210176, AG023501, 1210195, AG019724, AG052943, NIA U01 AG052943, U01AG052943, R01AG057234, P01AG019724, R01AG075775, P50AG023501)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (K23DC018021, NIA U01 AG052943, DC013270, K24DC015544, R01DC013270)
  • Fogarty International Center
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RF1NS050915, NIA U01 AG052943, R01NS050915)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
primary progressive aphasia, logopenic variant PPA, morphosyntactic analysis, automated speech analysis, part-of-speech tagging, subordinating conjunctions, posterior inferior frontal gyrus, cortical atrophy, connected speech
MeSH terms
Atrophy, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Speech, Aphasia, Primary Progressive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review