Cited by 12Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCerebrovascular and genetic disordersNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

APOE4 and Confluent White Matter Hyperintensities Have a Synergistic Effect on Episodic Memory Impairment in Prodromal Dementia

Kumar, Dilip, Yatawara, Chathuri, Wang, Brian, Wong, Benjamin, Tan, Yi Jayne, Zailan, Fatin Zahra, Ng, Kok Pin, Kandiah, Nagaendran·2022·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are a known risk factor for cognitive decline. While the ɛ4 allele of apolipoprotein E gene (APOE4) is another risk factor for cognitive decline, it remains unclear how APOE4 affects the relationship between WMH and cognitive decline, specifically in the prodromal stage of dementia. OBJECTIVE: To determine how APOE4 moderates the relationship between WMH and cognition in prodromal dementia. METHODS: Two-hundred-sixteen participants with prodromal dementia underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), neuropsychological testing (global and domain wise), cardiovascular risk factor assessments, and APOE genotyping. Visual ratings for WMH as well as total and lobar WMH volumes were quantified. Moderation analysis was performed to determine the influence of APOE4 on the relationship between WMH and performance on global and domain-specific cognitive measures. The role of confluent and non-confluent WMH on cognition was additionally studied using logistic regression. RESULTS: APOE4 carriers (n = 49) had poorer memory and higher global WMH (10.01 mL versus 6.23 mL, p = 0.04), temporal WMH (1.17 mL versus 0.58 mL, p = 0.01), and occipital WMH (0.38mL versus 0.22 mL, p = 0.02) compared to APOE4 non-carriers (n = 167). Moderation analysis revealed that APOE4 positivity strengthened the relationship between higher global as well as lobar WMH burden and poorer episodic memory. Furthermore, APOE4 carriers with confluent WMH were 4.81 times more likely to have impaired episodic memory compared to non-confluent WMH and non-APOE carriers. CONCLUSION: The impact of WMH on memory may be strongest among APOE4 carriers. Clinicians targeting WMH would need to consider the APOE4 allele and WMH severity status to strategize cognitive interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-215556

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, D., Yatawara, C., Wang, B., Wong, B., Tan, Y. J., Zailan, F. Z., Ng, K. P., & Kandiah, N.
Affiliations
  • National Neuroscience Institute (SG)
  • Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Kandiah, Nagaendran
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2022-05-31
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
1103-1114
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W4223989832
Cited by
12
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
APOE ε4, white matter hyperintensities
MeSH terms
Brain, Dementia, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Leukoaraiosis, Apolipoprotein E4, Cognitive Dysfunction, Memory, Episodic, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review