Cited by 10Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchSex and Gender in HealthcareMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Sex Differences in Dementia, Cognition, and Health in the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)

Merrick, Richard, Brayne, Carol·2024·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Background: There is renewed interest in whether sex differences in dementia risk exist, and what influence social and biological factors have. Objective: To review evidence from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS), a multi-center population-representative cohort study in the UK; focusing on dementia and cognition, incorporating findings on participants’ health and social circumstances. Methods: After identifying all CFAS publications, the results of all sex-stratified primary analyses of CFAS data were narratively reviewed. Results: Of 337 publications, 94 report results by sex (including null findings), which are summarized by theme: dementia epidemiology, cognition, mental health, health expectancy, social context and biological resource (including neuropathology). Conclusions: Where differences are found they most commonly favor men; however, greater mortality in men may confound associations with age-related outcomes. This ‘survival bias’ may explain findings of greater risk of dementia and faster cognitive decline in women. Age-specific dementia incidence was similar between sexes, although reduced incidence across study generations was more pronounced in men. Mood disorders were more prevalent in women, but adjusting for disability and deprivation attenuated the association. Prominent findings from other cohorts that women have more Alzheimer’s disease pathology and greater risk of dementia from the Apolipoprotein E ɛ4 allele were not observed, warranting further investigation. The ‘male-female health-survival paradox’ is demonstrated whereby women live longer but with more comorbidity and disability. Examining why health expectancies changed differently over two decades for each sex (interacting with deprivation) may inform population interventions to improve cognitive, mental and physical health in later life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-240358

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Merrick, R., & Brayne, C.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Merrick, Richard
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2024-08-20
Volume
100
Issue
s1
Pages
S3-S12
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W4401455296
Cited by
10
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G035954/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
sex differences, dementia risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Dementia, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review