Cited by 186Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchSex and Gender in HealthcareMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Sex and gender differences in the causes of dementia: A narrative review

Open access
Rocca, Walter A., Mielke, Michelle M., Vemuri, Prashanthi, Miller, Virginia M.·2014·Maturitas

Abstract

This is a narrative review of new ideas and concepts related to differences between men and women in their risk of developing dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD). We introduce the concept of dimorphic neurology and the distinction between sex and gender. We then provide three examples of risk factors related to sex and gender from the literature. Apolipoprotein E genotype is equally common in men and women but has a stronger effect in women. Apolipoprotein E genotype is a biological factor that cannot be modified but interacts with sex or gender related factors that can be modified. Low education has a similar harmful effect in men and women but has been historically more common in women. Education is a social factor related to gender that can be modified. Finally, bilateral oophorectomy is a factor restricted to women. Bilateral oophorectomy is a surgical practice related to sex that can be modified. Consideration of risk and protective factors in men and women separately may accelerate etiologic research for neurological diseases in general, and for dementia and AD in particular. Similarly, future preventive interventions for dementia should be tailored to men and women separately.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.008

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower educational attainment in women than in men born in the first half of the 20th century may contribute to elevated risk in women, as limited formal education is a risk factor for dementia.

    “For example, lower educational attainment in women than in men born in the first half of the 20th century may contribute to elevated risk in women, as limited formal education is a risk factor for dementia.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [301]

    Section 3.2 identifies lower education as an established dementia risk factor and says men historically had greater access to advanced education in some countries. The Abstract also says low education was historically more common in women. The paper does not specifically establish the comparison for everyone born in the first half of the 20th century; its historical comparison is qualified by country. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lower educational attainment in women than in men born in the first half of the 20th century may contribute to elevated dementia risk in women, because limited formal education is a dementia risk factor.

    “lower educational attainment in women than in men born in the first half of the 20 th century may contribute to elevated risk in women, as limited formal education is a risk factor for dementia.275”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [275]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Krieger N Epidemiology and the Peoples Health Theory and Context 2011 Oxford University Press, Inc. New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rocca, W. A., Mielke, M. M., Vemuri, P., & Miller, V. M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Rocca, Walter A.
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
196-201
ISSN
0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003468076
Cited by
186
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maturitas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Oracle
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG034676, P50AG044170, AG-034676, AG 044170, U01AG037526, U01AG006786, AG-006786, AG037526)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
sex differences, gender differences, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, APOE genotype, educational attainment, bilateral oophorectomy, dementia risk factors, dementia prevention, sex-specific interventions
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Dementia, Educational Status, Female, Gender Identity, Genotype, Humans, Male, Ovariectomy, Risk Factors, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review