Cited by 29Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease: The Shortcomings of Antioxidant Therapies

Open access
Pappolla, Miguel A., Martins, Ralph N., Poeggeler, Burkhard, Omar, Rawhi A., Perry, George·2024·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by gradual and progressive cognitive decline leading to dementia. At its core, the neuropathological features of AD include hallmark accumulations of amyloid-β and hyperphosphorylated tau proteins. Other harmful processes, such as oxidative stress and inflammation, contribute to the disease’s neuropathological progression. This review evaluates the role of oxidative stress in AD, placing a spotlight on the disappointing outcomes of various antioxidant clinical trials. Several hypotheses are discussed that might elucidate the failures of these therapies in AD. Specifically: 1) The paradoxical and overlooked harmful implications of prooxidant intermediates, particularly stemming from conventional antioxidants like vitamins E and C; 2) The challenges and failure to appreciate the issue of bioavailability—epitomized by the dictum “no on-site protection, no protection”—and the preeminent, yet often ignored, role played by endogenous antioxidant enzymes in combating oxidative stress; 3) The influence of unrecognized etiologies, such as latent infectious agents and others, as foundational drivers of oxidative stress in AD; 4) The underestimation of the complexity of oxidative mechanisms and the necessity of multi-targeted therapeutic approaches, such as those provided by various diets; and 5) The limitations of clinical trial designs in fully capturing the effects of antioxidants on AD progression. This article also examines the outcomes of select clinical trials while highlighting the challenges and barriers these therapies pose, offering insights into potential mechanisms to overcome their marginal success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-240659

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pappolla, M. A., Martins, R. N., Poeggeler, B., Omar, R. A., & Perry, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, Faculty of Biology and Psychology, Georg August University, Gottingen, Germany
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Pappolla, Miguel A.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2024-10-18
Volume
101
Issue
s1
Pages
S155-S178
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W4403538742
Cited by
29
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, oxidative stress
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Antioxidants, Humans, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review