Cited by 22Voice and Speech DisordersPhonetics and Phonology ResearchRespiratory and Cough-Related Research

Aerodynamic Assessment of Phonatory Onset in Parkinson's Disease: Evidence of Decreased Scaling of Laryngeal and Respiratory Control

Open access
Hammer, Michael J.·2013·Journal of Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract

Background: Phonatory onset is important for speech and voice and may be substantially impaired in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, the physiologic contributions of laryngeal and respiratory control to phonatory onset in PD are not well understood. Acoustic measurement of phonatory onset in neurological disease has been limited due to the confounding effects of dysarthria and the limited yield of physiologic detail. Objective: The purpose of this study was to test whether air flow measures would be useful to characterize respiratory and laryngeal contributions to phonatory onset, whether acoustic and air flow measures of phonatory onset were aberrant in PD, and whether deficits were significantly associated with voice severity. Methods: Twenty-one PD participants were tested and compared with 25 healthy controls. Testing included acoustic and air flow measures of phonatory onset during syllable production ([pa]) and measures of voice severity. Results: Air flow assessment was possible for all participants; acoustic assessment was only possible for 86% of PD participants. Air flow and acoustic measures revealed shorter phonatory onset times for PD participants than controls. Air flow measures also revealed that PD participants expelled less lung air volume per syllable. Aberrant timing of phonatory onset and reduced lung air volume were associated with increased voice severity. Conclusions: These findings suggest that air flow measures may be useful to assess the laryngeal and respiratory contributions to phonatory onset. These results also suggest that both respiratory and laryngeal control deficits may contribute to phonatory errors in PD, and that phonatory onset deficits are associated with voice severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jpd-130180

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insufficient laryngeal function and abnormal laryngeal somatosensory function could have contributed to the lower vocal loudness in the participants.

    “Insufficient laryngeal function and abnormal laryngeal somatosensory function could have contributed to the lower vocal loudness in our participants [54, 55].”

    From Comparing face-to-face and online LSVT®LOUD speech training using LSVT®Coach in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Results and Discussion link aberrant laryngeal and respiratory control in participants with Parkinson’s disease to greater voice severity, which supports a possible laryngeal contribution to voice problems. The paper does not establish that these deficits caused lower vocal loudness specifically, and it does not test whether abnormal laryngeal somatosensory function contributed to loudness. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Titze IR 1994 Summary Statement Titze IR Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis National Center for Voice and Speech Denver, CO

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammer, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Hammer, Michael J.
Venue
Journal of Parkinson’s Disease
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
173-179
ISSN
  • 1877-7171 (ISSN-L)
  • 1877-718X
OpenAlex
W1568441342
Cited by
21
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Parkinson s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000427)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (L30 DC010356, R03DC010900, DC010900)
  • National Center for Research Resources (K12RR023268, RR025012, KL2RR025012, RR023268)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, air flow measurement, laryngeal control, respiratory control, dysarthria
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Laryngeal Diseases, Lung Volume Measurements, Male, Neurologic Examination, Parkinson Disease, Phonation, Respiration Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Speech Production Measurement, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review