Cited by 152Disability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare StudiesMental Health and Patient Involvement

The work project survey: Consumer perspectives on work

McQuilken, Michael, Zahniser, James H., Novak, Jeanne, Starks, Roy D., Olmos, Antonio, Bond, Gary R.·2003·Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: Mental health consumers at an urban mental health center were surveyed about their motivations for working and perceived barriers to employment. Design: A survey was developed and administered by a consumer-led research team to 389 persons receiving case management and outpatient services. Results: Most consumers were either working (16%; n=59) or reported a desire to work (46%; n=170). The latter group constituted 55% of the 310 respondents who were not working at the time of the study. The most common perceived barrier was the fear of losing Social Security benefits. Consumers also reported concerns about receiving low pay and being ashamed of their job histories. Among the 38% of the total sample who expressed a reluctance or unwillingness to work, two-thirds (n=58) indicated that, if they did not have to worry about losing their Social Security benefits while working, they would try to obtain employment. A total of 179 (49%) respondents expressed a preference for receiving vocational services at their clinical sites, versus at a clubhouse location. Conclusions: Most consumers in this study were working or wanted to work. Consumers' motivations for work can be increased, especially if key barriers to work are described as removable. Preferences for types and locations of vocational services need to be considered in planning services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jvr-2003-00178

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with mental illness recognise the benefits of employment; a desire for personal growth and avoiding idleness, in addition to financial gain, motivate them to seek employment.

    “People with mental illness recognise the benefi ts of employment; indeed research has shown that a desire for personal growth and avoiding idleness, in addition to fi nancial gain, motivate people with mental illness to seek employment. 8”
  • The level of desire for employment varies greatly from study to study because of unique local contexts, such as the availability of unemployment benefits and social supports.

    “The level of desire for employment varies greatly from study to study because of unique local contexts, such as the availability of unemployment benefi ts and social supports. 9”
  • Estimates from Western countries of the proportion of unemployed people with mental illness who would like to return to competitive work vary between 55% and 78%.

    “estimates from Western countries vary between 55% and 78%. 9,10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McQuilken, M., Zahniser, J. H., Novak, J., Starks, R. D., Olmos, A., & Bond, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Mental Health Center of Denver (US)
  • Greenville College (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
Published
2003-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
59-68
ISSN
  • 1052-2263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-6316
OpenAlex
W193417944
Cited by
152
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
mental health service users, employee motivation, barriers to employment, social security benefits, vocational services, consumer preferences, case management, mental health services, low wages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review