Cited by 7Occupational Health and PerformanceLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesSports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Energy cost during locomotion across snow: A comparison of four types of snowshoes with snowshoe design considerations

Knapik, Joseph J., Hickey, Charles, Ortega, Samson, Pontbriand, Rene de·2002·WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation

Abstract

Snowshoes are a common method of locomotion across snow but no investigations has previously examined the energy cost of different snowshoe models or looked for desirable snowshoe design characteristics. To this end, four Marines were studied while walking at 4 km/h in four different types of snowshoes. They traversed a field with an average grade of 2.4%, downhill and once uphill with each snowshoe. Expired respiratory gases (for energy cost measures) and heart rates were collected continuously during the walk. The Pride Assault and US Army Standard models had a lower energy cost than the Montana Light model and tended to have a lower cost than the British Assault model. Correlations between snowshoe mass/surface area ratios and energy cost were 0.81 and 0.72 on the uphill and downhill portions of the course, respectively. Examination of the physical attributes of the snowshoes suggested several design characteristics may be favorable from an energy cost perspective: 1) a hinge-and-binding system that allows the snowshoe to be dragged across the snow, 2) an upturned front that pushes snow away and allows a more horizontal (less vertical) displacement of the snowshoe during locomotion, 3) a narrow profile that avoids leg abduction, and 4) a lower mass to surface area ratio. Further research will be necessary to determine the importance of these factors because of the limited number of subjects and the single snow condition examined here.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-2002-00214

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Knapik, J. J., Hickey, C., Ortega, S., & Pontbriand, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Directorate of Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance, US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010, USA
  • Individual Performance Branch, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
Venue
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation
Published
2002-01
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
171-177
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W2132254454
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
snowshoes, energy cost of locomotion, pulmonary gas exchange, heart rate, military personnel
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Energy Metabolism, Equipment Design, Heart Rate, Humans, Locomotion, Military Medicine, Oxygen Consumption, Shoes, Snow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review