Cited by 39Medical Practices and RehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-beingMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Return to work: The predictive value of the Worker Role Interview (WRI) over two years

Open access
Ekbladh, Elin·2010·Work

Abstract

Worker Role Interview (WRI) is an assessment tool designed to identify psychosocial and environmental factors which influence a person's ability to return to work. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the Worker Role Interview (WRI) can predict return to work over a period of two years. Fifty three long-term sick-listed people were interviewed and rated with the WRI. Differences in ratings and the ability of WRI to correctly predict whether these people would fall into the working or non-working groups at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-ups were tested by Mann-Whitney test and logistic regression respectively. Eight of 17 items in WRI were rated differently between the groups at one or more of the follow-ups. The regression models based on the WRI ratings had an overall correct prediction rate ranging from 81% to 96%. 'Expectation of job success' which concerns the person's belief in abilities in relation to return to work emerged as an important predictive factor for return to work in all statistical analyses. The WRI assessment contains items that could predict return to work. This implies that the WRI could be a useful tool in vocational rehabilitation for identifying individual rehabilitation needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-2010-0968

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekbladh, E.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ekbladh, Elin
Venue
Work
Published
2010
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
163-172
ISSN
1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1531296654
Cited by
39
References
28
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
return to work, psychosocial factors, environmental factors, vocational rehabilitation, rehabilitation needs assessment, work ability
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Predictive Value of Tests, Sweden, Work Capacity Evaluation, Reproducibility of Results, Logistic Models, Sick Leave

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review