Cited by 2Fetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

A guiding approach of Ultrasound scan for accurately obtaining standard diagnostic planes of fetal brain malformation

Yu, Yalan, Chen, Zhong, Zhuang, Yan, Yi, Heng, Han, Lin, Chen, Ke, Lin, Jiangli·2022·Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard planes (SPs) are crucial for the diagnosis of fetal brain malformation. However, it is very time-consuming and requires extensive experiences to acquire the SPs accurately due to the large difference in fetal posture and the complexity of SPs definitions. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to present a guiding approach that could assist sonographer to obtain the SPs more accurately and more quickly. METHODS: To begin with, sonographer uses the 3D probe to scan the fetal head to obtain 3D volume data, and then we used affine transformation to calibrate 3D volume data to the standard body position and established the corresponding 3D head model in ‘real time’. When the sonographer uses the 2D probe to scan a plane, the position of current plane can be clearly show in 3D head model by our RLNet (regression location network), which can conduct the sonographer to obtain the three SPs more accurately. When the three SPs are located, the sagittal plane and the coronal planes can be automatically generated according to the spatial relationship with the three SPs. RESULTS: Experimental results conducted on 3200 2D US images show that the RLNet achieves average angle error of the transthalamic plane was 3.91±2.86°, which has a obvious improvement compared other published data. The automatically generated coronal and sagittal SPs conform the diagnostic criteria and the diagnostic requirements of fetal brain malformation. CONCLUSIONS: A guiding scanning method based deep learning for ultrasonic brain malformation screening is firstly proposed and it has a pragmatic value for future clinical application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/xst-221278

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Chen, Z., Zhuang, Y., Yi, H., Han, L., Chen, K., & Lin, J.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Chengdu Military General Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Lin, Jiangli
Venue
Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology
Published
2022-11-24
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1243-1260
ISSN
  • 0895-3996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9114
OpenAlex
W4297019197
Cited by
2
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
fetal brain malformations, ultrasound guidance, 3D ultrasound, affine transformation, 3D head model, sagittal plane, frontal plane, deep learning
MeSH terms
Brain, Female, Head, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review