Cited by 67Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

A Deep Learning Solution for Automatic Fetal Neurosonographic Diagnostic Plane Verification Using Clinical Standard Constraints

Yaqub, Mohammad, Kelly, Brenda, Papageorghiou, Aris T., Noble, J. Alison·2017·Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

During routine ultrasound assessment of the fetal brain for biometry estimation and detection of fetal abnormalities, accurate imaging planes must be found by sonologists following a well-defined imaging protocol or clinical standard, which can be difficult for non-experts to do well. This assessment helps provide accurate biometry estimation and the detection of possible brain abnormalities. We describe a machine-learning method to assess automatically that transventricular ultrasound images of the fetal brain have been correctly acquired and meet the required clinical standard. We propose a deep learning solution, which breaks the problem down into three stages: (i) accurate localization of the fetal brain, (ii) detection of regions that contain structures of interest and (iii) learning the acoustic patterns in the regions that enable plane verification. We evaluate the developed methodology on a large real-world clinical data set of 2-D mid-gestation fetal images. We show that the automatic verification method approaches human expert assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.07.013

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yaqub, M., Kelly, B., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Noble, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Yaqub, Mohammad
Venue
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
2925-2933
ISSN
0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2759207985
Cited by
67
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/L505316/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
fetal neurosonography, fetal brain biometry, fetal brain anomalies, deep learning, brain localization
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review