The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the Elderly
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Certain drugs are classified as potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) for the elderly because they carry an increased risk of adverse drug events in this patient group. PIM lists from other countries are of limited usefulness in Germany because different drugs are on the market in each country and prescribing practices vary as well. Thus, a list of potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly was developed specifically for use in Germany. METHODS: A preliminary PIM list suitable for the German market was created on the basis of a selective literature search and a qualitative analysis of published international PIM lists. The final German PIM list was developed by means of a comprehensive, structured expert survey in two rounds (a so-called Delphi process). RESULTS: 83 drugs in a total of 18 drug classes were rated as potentially inappropriate for elderly patients. For 46 drugs, the experts came to no clear decision after the second Delphi round. For cases in which the administration of a PIM is clinically necessary, the final PRISCUS list contains recommendations for clinical practice, e.g. monitoring of laboratory values and dose adaptation. Therapeutic alternatives are also listed. CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate medications carry the risk of causing adverse drug events in the elderly. A drawback of using a Delphi process to generate a PIM list, as was done for the new German list, is that little scientific evidence is currently available for the evaluation of active substances, potential therapeutic alternatives, and indicated monitoring procedures. Thus, the validity and practicability of the PRISCUS list remain to be demonstrated (and the same holds for PIM lists already published in other countries). It should be used as a component of an overall concept for geriatric pharmacotherapy in which polypharmacy and interacting medications are avoided, and doses are regularly re-evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Fick, D. M., Cooper, J. W., Wade, W. E., Waller, J. L., Maclean, J. R., & Beers, M. H. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.22.2716 · Cited by 2,389
Comorbidity or multimorbidity: what's in a name? A review of literature
van den Akker, M., Buntinx, F., & Knottnerus, J. A. (1996) · European Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3109/13814789609162146 · Cited by 857 · cited 1×
“Multimorbidity is more common in advanced age (1) and leads inevitably to polypharmacy.”
BackgroundProblems in the “Evidence” of “Evidence-Based Medicine”
Feinstein, A. R., & Horwitz, R. I. (1997) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00244-1 · Cited by 653
The clinical implications of ageing for rational drug therapy
Shi, S., Mörike, K., & Klotz, U. (2008) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-007-0422-1 · Cited by 244
Wilson, K., & Mottram, P. (2004) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1156 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017
Hiemke, C., Bergemann, N., Clement, H., Conca, A., Deckert, J., Domschke, K., Eckermann, G., Egberts, K., Gerlach, M., Greiner, C., et al. (2018) · Pharmacopsychiatry · doi:10.1055/s-0043-116492 · Cited by 1,446
Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis
Oscanoa, T. J., Lizaraso, F., & Carvajal, A. (2017) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2225-3 · Cited by 382
Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality
Christensen, M., & Lundh, A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008986.pub3 · Cited by 298
Tommelein, E., Mehuys, E., Petrovic, M., Somers, A., Colin, P., & Boussery, K. (2015) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1954-4 · Cited by 292
Effectiveness and Safety of Dementia Care Management in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Thyrian, J. R., Hertel, J., Wucherer, D., Eichler, T., Michalowsky, B., Dreier-Wolfgramm, A., Zwingmann, I., Kilimann, I., Teipel, S., & Hoffmann, W. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2124 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Holt, S., Schmiedl, S., & Thürmann, P. A.
- Venue
- Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
- Publisher
- Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
- Published
- 2010-08-09
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 31-32
- Pages
- 543-51
- ISSN
- 1866-0452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098891980
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the Elderly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0543
- The paper
- Holt, S., Schmiedl, S., & Thürmann, P. A. (2010). Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the Elderly. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.