The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inter-personal behaviour
Open accessAbstract
Definition: An individual human behaviour that involves an interaction between two or more people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 · Cited by 3,732
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Michie, S. (2005) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 · Cited by 3,440
Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours
Quested, T. E., Marsh, E., Stunell, D., & Parry, A. D. (2013) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011 · Cited by 886
Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems
Axhausen, K. W., & Gärling, T. (1992) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441649208716826 · Cited by 649
Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct
Verplanken, B. (2006) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466605x49122 · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- (BCIO), B. C. I. O.
- Venue
- Definitions
- Publisher
- Qeios
- Published
- 2022-08-24
- OpenAlex
- W4293213792
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inter-personal behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.32388/ddp5lr
- The paper
- (BCIO), B. C. I. O. (2022). Inter-personal behaviour. Definitions. https://doi.org/10.32388/ddp5lr
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
