Cited by 27Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsAgricultural and Biological Research

Cannabinoids Enriched Extracts from Industrial Hemp Residues

Open access
Vági, Erika, Balázs, Margit, Komóczi, Attila, Kiss, István, Mihalovits, Máté, Székely, Edit·2019·Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Obtaining phytocannabinoids, associated with various medicinal and therapeutic properties with no reported side effects, is one of the hot topics. The phychotropic Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is less than 0.2 % in industrial cultivars therefore can be grown legally in many EU countries. Harvesting and processing of hemp for fiber or seeds generates large amount of wastes containing substantial amounts of bioactives such as cannabidiol (CBD) which are the primary cannabinoids along with cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabinol (CBN), cannabigerol (CBG), and cannabichromene (CBC). The aim of this work was to optimize the extraction of cannabinoids from industrial hemp threshing residue using supercritical carbon dioxide extraction in pilot scales. The effects of extraction pressure and temperature on the extraction yield were evaluated. Three ground and pelleted samples of the same type but with different harvesting time were also compared. After derivatization of the samples the cannabinoids and the minor THCs were quantified by GC-MS. The extraction yields were between 0.2 – 6.59 g/100 g dry mass depending on the source of hemp residue and on the process parameters of the extraction process. By increasing the pressure of extraction (in the range of 25-45 MPa at 45 °C) the extraction yields increased, meanwhile the yields of cannabinoids showed no significant increase. The volatile compounds were successfully separated from the cannabinoids with fractionated separation. From hemp threshing residues essential oil free extracts with high content of cannabinoids were obtained at 35 MPa extraction pressure and 45 °C temperature setting the first separator at 8 MPa and 40 °C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3311/ppch.12896

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vági, E., Balázs, M., Komóczi, A., Kiss, I., Mihalovits, M., & Székely, E.
Affiliations
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
  • Bay Zoltán Foundation for Applied Research (HU)
Venue
Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering
Published
2019-03-22
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
357-363
ISSN
  • 0324-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1587-3765
OpenAlex
W2929308867
Cited by
27
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem
  • Emberi Eroforrások Minisztériuma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
Keywords
cannabinoids, supercritical CO2 extraction, cannabidiol, cannabidiolic acid, extraction yield optimization, extraction pressure and temperature, essential oil separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review