Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR

Open access
Spencer, Andrew, Lentzsch, Suzanne, Weisel, Katja, Avet-Loiseau, Hervé, Mark, Tomer M., Spicka, Ivan, Masszi, Tamas, Lauri, Birgitta, Levin, Mark-David, Bosi, Alberto, Hungria, Vania, Cavo, Michele, Lee, Je-Jung, Nooka, Ajay K., Quach, Hang, Lee, Cindy, Barreto, Wolney, Corradini, Paolo, Min, Chang-Ki, Scott, Emma C., Chanan-Khan, Asher A., Horvath, Noemi, Capra, Marcelo, Beksac, Meral, Ovilla, Roberto, Jo, Jae-Cheol, Shin, Ho-Jin, Sonneveld, Pieter, Soong, David, Casneuf, Tineke, Chiu, Christopher, Amin, Himal, Qi, Ming, Thiyagarajah, Piruntha, Sasser, A. Kate, Schecter, Jordan M., Mateos, Maria-Victoria·2018·Haematologica

Abstract

Daratumumab, a CD38 human monoclonal antibody, demonstrated significant clinical activity in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in the primary analysis of CASTOR, a phase 3 study in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. A post hoc analysis based on treatment history and longer follow up is presented. After 19.4 (range: 0-27.7) months of median follow up, daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone prolonged progression-free survival (median: 16.7 versus 7.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.39; P2.5-fold higher with daratumumab across subgroups. The safety profile of daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone remained consistent with longer follow up. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone demonstrated significant clinical activity across clinically relevant subgroups and provided the greatest benefit to patients treated at first relapse. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 02136134.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3324/haematol.2018.194118

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Spencer, A., Lentzsch, S., Weisel, K., Avet-Loiseau, H., Mark, T. M., Spicka, I., Masszi, T., Lauri, B., Levin, M.-D., Bosi, A., Hungria, V., Cavo, M., Lee, J.-J., Nooka, A. K., Quach, H., Lee, C., Barreto, W., Corradini, P., Min, C.-K., Scott, E. C., Chanan-Khan, A. A., Horvath, N., Capra, M., Beksac, M., Ovilla, R., Jo, J.-C., Shin, H.-J., Sonneveld, P., Soong, D., Casneuf, T., Chiu, C., Amin, H., Qi, M., Thiyagarajah, P., Sasser, A. K., Schecter, J. M., & Mateos, M.-V.
Venue
Haematologica
Published
2018-09-20
Volume
103
Issue
12
Pages
2079-2087
ISSN
  • 0390-6078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1592-8721
OpenAlex
W2890161608
Cited by
263
References
13
FWCI
26.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3324/haematol.2018.194118
The paper
Spencer, A., Lentzsch, S., Weisel, K., Avet-Loiseau, H., Mark, T. M., Spicka, I., Masszi, T., Lauri, B., Levin, M.-D., Bosi, A., Hungria, V., Cavo, M., Lee, J.-J., Nooka, A. K., Quach, H., Lee, C., Barreto, W., Corradini, P., Min, C.-K., . . . Mateos, M.-V. (2018). Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. Haematologica. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.194118

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.