Cited by 41Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchClimate change impacts on agricultureClimate variability and models

Temperature, aridity thresholds, and population growth dynamics in China over the last millennium

Open access
Lee, HF, Zhang, DD, Fok, L·2009·Climate Research

Abstract

The relationship between climate and population has long been discussed, but rarely has it been quantitatively measured. Hence, the relationship remains ambiguous. In the present study, we employ fine-grained temperature, aridity threshold, and population data, together with logistic models and spatial statistics, to quantitatively explore how far climate change affected population growth dynamics in China from 1000 to 1979. Statistical results confirm that cold climate was associated with below average population growth, mediated by regional geographic contexts. In addition, cold climate triggered a southward shift of populations. In short, the climate-population relationship was evident in historical China, and temperature was more influential than the aridity threshold in explaining the fluctuation of population size and shifts in population distribution. The strong influence of temperature change on northward and southward population shifts and the weak influence of the change in the aridity threshold on population growth dynamics are further discussed. The observed temperature-population relationship may give some indication of future demographic effects from climate warming. © Inter-Research 2009.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/cr00816

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Li Bozhong compared two data sets on climate change and population over the past 2000 years, concluding that climate change decisively affected population variation.

    “Li Bozhong compared two data sets on climate change and population over the past 2000 years, concluding that climate change decisively affected population variation.”

    From Climate change and Chinese history: a review of trends, topics, and methods (2015) · cites this paper as [91]

    Section 5.2.2 says the authors found a climate–population relationship in historical China. But the paper describes its own analysis of China from 1000 to 1979; the passages do not support the attribution to Li Bozhong, a comparison of two datasets over 2,000 years, or an unqualified conclusion that climate change decisively affected population variation. No page number is available for the cited passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Li Bozhong's analysis took into account other direct and indirect factors, including crop failure and social crisis.

    “This analysis took into account other direct and indirect factors, including crop failure and social crisis, respectively.91”

    From Climate change and Chinese history: a review of trends, topics, and methods (2015) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Working Hypotheses section discusses harvest failures and subsequent war, famine, and epidemics, but it does not describe Li Bozhong’s analysis or say which factors that analysis took into account. Searches for “Li Bozhong,” “Bozhong,” and “direct and indirect factors” found no passage addressing that attribution; the cited passages provide no page number. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Jiang T (1993) Zhongguo jindai renkou shi. Hangzhou Uni- versity Press, Hangzhou (in Chinese)
  2. National Research Council (1998) Decade-to-century-scale climate variability and change: a science strategy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
  3. Turchin P (2003) Historical dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
  4. Zhou Z (1997) Zhongguo fengjian shehui de renkou zhouqi xiaozhang yu huangchao zhouqi xunhuan guanxi zhi tantao. Journal of Hangzhou University 27:71-78 (in Chi- nese)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H., Zhang, D., & Fok, L.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
ORCID
Fok, L
Venue
Climate Research
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
39
Pages
131-147
ISSN
  • 0936-577X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1572
OpenAlex
W2088813713
Cited by
41
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Research (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
temperature, aridity threshold, population growth, historical demography, China, last millennium, cold climate, logistic growth model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review