The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red List threat assessments
Open accessAbstract
The current biodiversity crisis is characterized by the decline and extinction of numerous animal populations and species world-wide.To aid in understanding the threats and causes of population decline and the assessment of endangerment status of a species, conservation scientists and practitioners are increasingly relying on remote assessments using biotelemetry (radio telemetry, acoustic telemetry, satellite tracking) and biologging (archival loggers) or hybrid technologies (e.g.pop-up satellite tags).These tools offer increasingly sophisticated means (e.g.large-scale telemetry arrays, fine-scale positioning, and use of physiological and environmental sensors) of evaluating the behaviour, spatial ecology, energetics, and physiology of free-living animals in their natural environment.Regional, national, and international threat assessments (e.g. the International Union for the Conservation of Nature [IUCN] Red List) require basic knowledge of animal distribution, emigration, behaviour, reproductive potential, mortality rates, and habitat use, which in many cases can all be obtained through biotelemetry and biologging studies.Such studies are particularly useful for understanding the basic biology of animals living in harsh environments (e.g.polar regions, aquatic environments), for rapidly moving or cryptic animals, and for those that undertake large-scale movements/migrations (e.g.birds, insects, marine mammals and fish).The premise of this paper is that biotelemetry and biologging have much to offer and should be embraced by the conservation science community to aid in assessment of threats and endangerment status.It is crucial that studies on endangered species must not further contribute to species decline or retard recovery.As such, there are complicated ethical and legal considerations that must be considered prior to implementing tracking studies on endangered wildlife.Furthermore, as many endangered animal species occur in developing countries, there is a need to develop capacity (financial support for the research and technical telemetry skills) for designing and conducting tracking studies.To stem the loss of biodiversity and aid in the recovery of endangered animal populations, there is a need for innovative and interdisciplinary research, monitoring programs and research initiatives to inform decision makers.It is clear that biotelemetry and biologging are not a panacea; however, they are valuable tools available to conservation practitioners.Used appropriately, biotelemetry and biologging have the potential to provide data that is often unattainable using other techniques, and can reduce uncertainty in the assignment of conservation status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change
Parmesan, C. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 · Cited by 8,652
Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data.
Buckland, S. T., White, G. C., & Garrott, R. A. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532535 · Cited by 2,706
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters
Hampe, A., & Petit, R. J. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x · Cited by 2,234
The need for evidence-based conservation
Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M., & Knight, T. M. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018 · Cited by 1,822
Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity
Webster, M. S., Marra, P. P., Haig, S. M., Bensch, S., & Holmes, R. T. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02380-1 · Cited by 1,267
Boyce, M. S. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002405 · Cited by 1,242
The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation
RODRIGUES, A., PILGRIM, J., LAMOREUX, J., HOFFMANN, M., & BROOKS, T. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010 · Cited by 1,238
HARRIS, S., CRESSWELL, W. J., FORDE, P. G., TREWHELLA, W. J., WOOLLARD, T., & WRAY, S. (1990) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1990.tb00106.x · Cited by 1,179
Cited by
Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior
Brown, D. D., Kays, R., Wikelski, M., Wilson, R., & Klimley, A. (2013) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/2050-3385-1-20 · Cited by 623
Turn costs change the value of animal search paths.
Wilson, R. P., Griffiths, I. W., Legg, P. A., Friswell, M. I., Bidder, O. R., Halsey, L. G., Lambertucci, S. A., & Shepard, E. L. C. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12149 · Cited by 142
A Novel Framework to Protect Animal Data in a World of Ecosurveillance
Lennox, R. J., Harcourt, R., Bennett, J. R., Davies, A., Ford, A. T., Frey, R. M., Hayward, M. W., Hussey, N. E., Iverson, S. J., Kays, R., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa035 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooke, S.
- Venue
- Endangered Species Research
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2008-01-18
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 165-185
- ISSN
- 1613-4796 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-5407
- OpenAlex
- W2072981395
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red List threat assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/esr00063
- The paper
- Cooke, S. (2008). Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red List threat assessments. Endangered Species Research. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.