CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Caffeine Effects on Risky Decision Making After 75 Hours of Sleep Deprivation

Killgore, William D. S., Lipizzi, Erica L., Kamimori, Gary H., Balkin, Thomas J.·2007·Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
DOI 10.3357/asem.2106.2007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction Recent research indicates that sleep deprivation impairs decision making. However, it is unknown to what extent such deficits are exacerbated in a dose-response manner by increasing levels of sleepiness, and the extent to which such sleep-loss-induced deficits can be reversed by caffeine. Methods At three time points, 26 healthy subjects completed alternate forms of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): rested baseline, 51 h awake, and 75 h awake. Every 2 h each night, 12 volunteers also received 4 200-mg doses of caffeine, with the last dose occurring 3 h prior to the IGT. Results At baseline, volunteers readily learned to avoid disadvantageous high-risk card decks while progressively choosing more frequently from advantageous low-risk card decks. When sleep deprived, however, these same subjects showed impaired performance, choosing more frequently from the disadvantageous high-risk card decks, particularly during the latter half of the game. Contrary to expectations, the severity of performance impairment did not increase significantly from 51 to 75 h of wakefulness, and caffeine had no significant effects on IGT performance during sleep deprivation. Discussion and conclusions As a provisional extension of our previous study, these preliminary findings further suggest that the ability to integrate emotion with cognition to guide decision making, a capacity believed to be mediated by the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, may be particularly vulnerable to sleep loss. More…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3357/asem.2106.2007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Killgore, W. D. S., Lipizzi, E. L., Kamimori, G. H., & Balkin, T. J.
Venue
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
Aerospace Medical Association
Published
2007-10-01
Volume
78
Issue
10
Pages
957-962
ISSN
0095-6562
DOI
10.3357/asem.2106.2007
Cited by
79
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review