Cited by 39Menstrual Health and DisordersDisaster Management and ResilienceGender Studies and Social Issues

Menstrual hygiene: a ‘silent’ need during disaster recovery

Sneha Krishnan, Sneha Krishnan, John Twigg, John Twigg·2016·Waterlines

Abstract

Post-disaster relief and recovery operations seldom focus on women’s priorities regarding menstrual hygiene. There is an increasing awareness to incorporate inclusive, participatory, and gender-sensitive strategies for implementation of response programmes. This article presents empirical findings related to menstrual hygiene management (MHM), demonstrating it is integral to women’s privacy and safety during recovery. Using case studies from India, the 2012 Assam floods and 2013 Cyclone Phailin in Odisha, this article explores menstrual hygiene practices in a post-disaster context. The data were collected through participatory learning and action tools such as focus group discussions, household interviews, priority ranking, and observations. It emerged that menstrual hygiene was overlooked at the household level during recovery; women and adolescent girls faced seclusion and isolation, exacerbating privacy and security concerns post-disasters. Some humanitarian agencies have an ad hoc approach towards MHM, which is limited to distribution of sanitary pads and does not address the socio-cultural practices around MHM. There is a need for strategic planning to address MHM with a gender-sensitive and inclusive approach. This article draws practical and policy inferences from the research for stronger approaches towards initiating behaviour change in MHM, and addressing attitudes and knowledge regarding menstrual hygiene.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Post-disaster recovery in Assam and Odisha overlooked menstrual hygiene at the household level, forcing women and girls into seclusion, privacy and security risks, and ad hoc aid limited largely to sanitary pad distribution. The paper argues that menstrual hygiene management must be integrated into gender-sensitive WASH recovery planning, assessment, and policy.

Key findings

  • In the 2012 Assam floods, 70% of women and girl participants reported open defecation and managing menstruation while defecating or bathing; 100% reported restrictions during menstruation, including being prohibited from kitchen and prayer rooms; at least 50% found it difficult to use a separate soap or detergent for menstrual linen post-floods; women travelled 3–5 km in the dark for personal needs, posing a security risk.
  • In Odisha after 2013 Cyclone Phailin, 100% of girls were unaware of disposal mechanisms for sanitary pads; in villages with market access, 70% of adolescent girls preferred sanitary pads and 30% studied in Puri; in remote fishing households, 100% of female participants used old sarees as menstrual linen; 60% across Odisha used a separate soap for washing menstrual cloth.
  • Humanitarian response included hygiene kits with sanitary cloth, string, bag, and detergent soap, privacy screens, female facilitators, and a staff checklist, but MHM was often ad hoc, limited to distribution of sanitary pads, and did not address socio-cultural practices around MHM.
  • Analysis of the Disaster Management Act 2005, Swachh Bharat Abhiyan 2013, Odisha Relief Code, Assam Relief Manual, and state disaster management plans revealed no mention of strategies or explicit guidelines on incorporating MHM in post-disaster interventions.

Methods

  • Qualitative case studies in Eastern India: the 2012 Assam floods and erosion, and 2013 Cyclone Phailin and floods in Odisha. Fieldwork included visits from June 2012, a scoping study in January–February 2013, an extensive study in Solmari (Sonitpur) and Boramari (Morigaon) between August and October 2013, and a six-month Odisha study from October 2013 to March 2014 in Puri and Balasore districts.
  • Data were collected through semi-structured and unstructured interviews and participatory learning and action tools: seven FGDs each in Assam and Odisha with rural women aged 19–35; unstructured interviews with women-headed households (six in Assam, 10 in Odisha); 39 semi-structured interviews with NGO staff, experts, and humanitarian and government officials in Assam; plus transect walks, priority ranking, and observations.
  • Data were manually coded and thematically analysed. Ethical procedures included doing no harm, informed consent, privacy, UCL ethical guidelines, and compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998, Part II.

Limitations

  • Stated: because participants were disaster-affected and in despair, they were not probed for further information if they did not wish to discuss private and sensitive issues; the article anonymizes data from the two cases; practical challenges affected ethical considerations.
  • Evident from the text: the findings come from two qualitative case studies in Assam and Odisha, so they are not statistically generalizable; the paper reports participant-reported percentages but no broader prevalence estimates.
  • Evident from the text: reliance on self-reported practices and recall may affect data quality, especially as adolescent girls were initially shy and reluctant to discuss menstrual hygiene; the 39 semi-structured interviews with officials were undertaken in Assam only, not Odisha.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3362/1756-3488.2016.020

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 4 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    After washing, the women and girls dried the cloth inside their homes in dark corners, instead of drying in the open, to prevent others from seeing or accidentally touching them.

    “After washing, the women and girls dried the cloth inside their homes in dark corners, instead of drying in the open, to prevent others from seeing or accidentally touching them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    In the fishing households located in remote villages in Odisha, access to markets in the main towns was a challenge.

    “The research found that in the fishing households, located in remote villages, the access to markets in the main towns was a challenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    Menstrual hygiene requirements, especially of girls, young women, and single-women headed households, were often overlooked.

    “Menstrual hygiene requirements, especially of the girls, young women, and single-women headed households, were often overlooked.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Assam floods, 2012 · p. 5

    In Assam, all female participants reported that menstrual hygiene was overlooked while preparing rescue kits.

    “All the female participants reported that menstrual hygiene was overlooked while preparing these kits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § Box 1 Checklist used by humanitarian agency, Odisha, for sensitizing programme staff towards MHM · p. 8

    The formation of separate adolescent girls' committees as well as school committees for water, sanitation, and personal hygiene provided a space to impart knowledge on menstrual hygiene to young girls and adolescents post-disasters.

    “The formation of separate adolescent girls' committees as well as school committees for water, sanitation, and personal hygiene provided a space to impart knowledge on menstrual hygiene to young girls and adolescents post-disasters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    The checklist was developed by the gender assessment team for integration of MHM for effective WASH recovery programmes.

    “The checklist was developed by the gender assessment team for integration of MHM for effective WASH recovery programmes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    Women claimed that due to poverty and a decrease in household income they had to prioritize other household needs and did not prefer to spend their limited income on purchasing sanitary pads.

    “The women claimed that due to poverty and a decrease in the household income they had to prioritize other household needs and did not prefer to spend their limited income on purchasing sanitary pads.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    In Odisha, women were responsible for household duties such as cooking, collecting water, washing and cleaning, and caring for the elderly and children.

    “In Odisha, women were responsible for household duties such as cooking, collecting water, washing and cleaning, and caring for the elderly and children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    During household interviews, 100 per cent of the respondents were concerned about food and water supplies after the disaster.

    “During household interviews, it emerged that 100 per cent of the respondents were concerned about food and water supplies after the disaster.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Box 1 Checklist used by humanitarian agency, Odisha, for sensitizing programme staff towards MHM · p. 8

    During distribution of emergency hygiene kits, female hygiene facilitators explained the use of menstrual hygiene materials in the kits in the local language.

    “During distribution of emergency hygiene kits, female hygiene facilitators explained the use of menstrual hygiene materials in the kits in the local language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    The assessment showed that since MHM issues were not discussed openly among household members, adolescent girls confided in female elders and followed their traditional knowledge and solutions to address rashes and cramps during menstruation.

    “The assessment showed that since MHM issues were not discussed openly among the household members, adolescent girls confided in the female elders in the house and followed their traditional knowledge and solutions to address rashes and cramps during menstruation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    These girls preferred using sanitary napkins but were concerned about the affordability of sanitary pads due to their meagre household income.

    “These girls preferred using sanitary napkins but were concerned about the affordability of sanitary pads due to their meagre household income.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    Gender assessments undertaken by gender experts in the humanitarian agency considered that improper menstrual care and lack of adequate facilities for women to address MHM posed risks for fungal infections and rashes for menstruating girls and women.

    “The gender assessments undertaken by gender experts in the humanitarian agency considered that improper menstrual care and lack of adequate facilities for women to address MHM posed risks for fungal infections and rashes for menstruating girls and women.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Assam floods, 2012 · p. 5

    In Assam, 70 per cent of the women and girl participants reported that they went for open defecation and tended to their menstrual needs while defecating or bathing.

    “In Assam 70 per cent of the women and girl participants reported that they went for open defecation, and tended to their menstrual needs while defecating or bathing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Box 1 Checklist used by humanitarian agency, Odisha, for sensitizing programme staff towards MHM · p. 8

    Community facilitators monitored the use of hygiene kit items during household visits, when female members discussed in private issues and concerns regarding menstrual hygiene.

    “The community facilitators monitored the use of hygiene kit items during household visits, when the female members discussed in private issues and concerns regarding menstrual hygiene.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Assam floods, 2012 · p. 5

    The agency determined the location for privacy screens after consultations with women community members.

    “The agency determined the location for privacy screens after consultations with women community members.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    These villages had fair access to local markets post-disasters; 30 per cent of the girls reported that they studied in Puri where they had exposure to other women who used sanitary pads.

    “These villages had fair access to local markets post-disasters; 30 per cent of the girls reported that they studied in the town of Puri where they had exposure to other women who used sanitary pads.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Assam floods, 2012 · p. 5

    Water inundation impacted all female participants responsible for water collection and restricted their privacy to wash menstrual linen near water sources because blood washed into open drains was visible to others.

    “This impacted all the female participants, who were responsible for water collection for household purposes, and also restricted their privacy to wash their menstrual linen near the water sources, as the blood washed into the open drains was visible to others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    In Odisha, girls who participated in the FGDs preferred using sanitary napkins, but their families could not afford them.

    “In Odisha, girls who participated in the FGDs preferred using sanitary napkins, but their families could not afford them”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    The girls did not have adequate information on how frequently they should change their pads and were unaware of safe disposal mechanisms of the used pads.

    “However, the girls did not have adequate information on how frequently they should change their pads and were unaware of safe disposal mechanisms of the used pads.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    Women hardly could attend to their personal hygiene, which was not prioritized during emergencies.

    “They hardly could attend to their personal hygiene, which was not prioritized during emergencies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 6

    Women preferred using cloth, which was cheaper and could be reused; these were changed only once every day during the cycle.

    “Therefore, women preferred using cloth, which was cheaper and could be reused; these were changed only once every day during the cycle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    Post-distribution, separate display stalls were installed where the use of kit items was explained to women by female community mobilizers and health promotion volunteers, covering use of sanitary cloth, maintenance of menstrual hygiene, and personal care in small groups of women.

    “Post-distribution, the separate display stalls were installed, where the use of the kit items was explained to women by female community mobilizers and health promotion volunteers, covering the use of sanitary cloth, maintenance of menstrual hygiene, and personal care in small groups of women.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Assam floods, 2012 · p. 5

    In Assam, all (100 per cent) female participants reported that they were restricted during menstruation and were prohibited from entering the main sections of the house, including the kitchen and prayer rooms.

    “All (100 per cent) of the female participants reported that they were restricted during 'those' days; during menstruation they were prohibited from entering the main sections of the house - kitchen and prayer rooms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, 2013 · p. 7

    Humanitarian agencies undertook staff training for both male and female staff members and provided participants with a checklist.

    “Humanitarian agencies undertook staff training to both male and female staff members, and provided participants with a checklist (Box 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Gendered recovery processes · p. 9

    In Assam, women were in charge of house rebuilding and daily expenses as men had migrated for work.

    “In Assam, it emerged that women were in charge of house rebuilding and daily expenses as men had migrated for work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Cultural practices · p. 9

    In Assam and Odisha the practice of seclusion during menstruation led to reduced mobility within the household and society as well as dietary restrictions for women.

    “In Assam and Odisha the practice of seclusion during menstruation led to reduced mobility within the household and society as well as dietary restrictions for women.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning
    § Recommendations and conclusions · p. 10

    Organizational understanding and learning of menstrual hygiene management remains tacit among the professionals engaged as hygiene promotion experts.

    “Hence, organizational understanding and learning of menstrual hygiene management remains tacit among the professionals engaged as hygiene promotion experts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Recommendations and conclusions · p. 10

    Since menstrual hygiene is still considered taboo and discussed behind closed doors, it features very low on household recovery priorities, and often does not even get mentioned.

    “Since menstrual hygiene is still considered taboo and discussed behind closed doors, it features very low on household recovery priorities, and often does not even get mentioned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Awareness of safe menstrual practices · p. 9

    The data highlight that there is a lack of awareness and knowledge about how frequently sanitary pads/cloths should be changed in a day during menstruation; appropriate disposal mechanisms; necessity of regular washing and cleanliness of private body parts; and appropriate measures for washing and drying menstrual linen.

    “The data highlight that there is a lack of awareness and knowledge about the following issues related to MHM: how frequently sanitary pads/cloths should be changed in a day during menstruation; appropriate disposal mechanisms; necessity of regular washing and cleanliness of private body parts; and appropriate measures for washing and drying menstrual linen.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Box 1 Checklist used by humanitarian agency, Odisha, for sensitizing programme staff towards MHM · p. 8

    General practices of hand washing and promotion of sanitation facilities were important in ensuring privacy and better environments for women to address urgent and private needs related to their menstrual health.

    “General practices of hand washing and promotion of sanitation facilities were important in ensuring privacy and better environments for women to address urgent and private needs related to their menstrual health.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationown data
    § Privacy for changing · p. 8

    Menstrual health is essential to the dignity and privacy of women.

    “but is essential to the dignity and privacy of women.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Assam floods, 2012 · p. 5

    Provision of handwashing facilities near latrines, separate spaces in bathing units for women to wash menstrual linen with privacy, and closed drains were useful because running wastewater did not display menstrual blood.

    “Provision of handwashing facilities near the latrines, separate spaces in bathing units for women to wash their menstrual linen with privacy, and closed drains were useful as the running wastewater did not display the menstrual blood.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Recommendations and conclusions · p. 10

    Post-disaster recovery provided a unique opportunity to generate awareness and build local knowledge and understanding of male and female members of the communities on menstrual hygiene management.

    “Moreover, post-disaster recovery provided a unique opportunity to generate awareness and build local knowledge and understanding of male and female members of the communities on menstrual hygiene management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The findings from the two case studies in Assam and Odisha are sufficiently representative to inform humanitarian agencies' MHM approaches in other post-disaster contexts.

    “Based on the empirical evidence, this research offers a practical suggestion to humanitarian agencies to enhance MHM in WASH interventions during recovery.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Parkinson, J. (2009) A Review of the Evidence Base for WASH Interventions in Emergency Responses, Atkins/UNICEF WASH Steering Group.
  2. Atuyambe, L.M., Lynn M., Ediau, M., Orach, C.G., Musenero, M. and Bazeyo, W. (2011) ‘Land slide disaster in eastern Uganda: rapid assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene situation in Bulucheke camp, Bududa district’, Environmental Health 10(38): 1–13 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-10-38>. · DOI
  3. Bosher, L. and Dainty, A. (2011) ‘Disaster risk reduction and “built-in” resilience: towards overarching principles for construction practice’, Disasters 35(1): 1–18 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01189.x>. · DOI
  4. Brown, J., Cavill, S., Cumming, O. and Jeandron, A. (2012) ‘Water, sanitation, and hygiene in emergencies: summary review and recommendations for further research’, Waterlines 31(1): 11–29 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2012.004>. · DOI
  5. Bryman, A. (2008) Social Research Methods, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Connolly, M., Gayer, M., Ryan, M.J., Spiegel, P., Salama, P. and Heymann, D.L. (2004) ‘Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges’, Lancet 364(9449): 1974–83 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17481-3>. · DOI
  7. King, K., Bosher, L.S. and Kayaga, S. (2013) ‘Resilience in the humanitarian sphere: stimulating resilience for recovery’, in R. Shaw (ed.), Proceedings of the 36th WEDC International Conference: Delivering Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Services in an Uncertain Environment, pp. 1–6, Loughborough: Water, Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University.
  8. Krishnan, S., Purwar, D. and Borah, B. (2015) ‘Sanitation and disasters: a case study of community and institutional response to Cyclone Phailin, Odisha 2013’, Waterlines 34(4): 412–23 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.034>. · DOI
  9. Muralidharan, A., Patil, H. and Patnaik, S. (2015) ‘Unpacking the policy landscape for menstrual hygiene management: implications for school WASH programmes in India’, Waterlines 34(1): 79–91 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.008>. · DOI
  10. Nawaz, J., Lal, S., Raza, S. and House, S. (2010) ‘Oxfam experience of providing screened toilet, bathing and menstruation units in its earthquake response in Pakistan’, Gender & Development 18: 81–9 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552071003600067>. · DOI
  11. O’Reilly, K., 2010. Combining sanitation and women’s participation in water supply: an example from Rajasthan. Development in Practice, 20(1), pp. 45–56. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09614520903436976> · DOI · Paper page
  12. Parker, A.H., Smith, J.A., Verdemato, T., Cooke, J., Webster, J. and Carter, R.C. (2014) ‘Menstrual management: a neglected aspect of hygiene interventions’, Disaster Prevention and Management 23(4): 437–54 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2013-0070>. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Parkinson, J. (2009) A Review of the Evidence Base for WASH Interventions in Emergency Responses, Atkins/UNICEF WASH Steering Group.
  14. Sommer, M. (2012) ‘Menstrual hygiene management in humanitarian emergencies: gaps and recommendations’, Waterlines 31(1–2): 83–104 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2012.008>. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Sommer, M., Caruso, B.A., Sahin, M., Calderon, T., Cavill, S., Mahon, T. and Phillips-Howard, P.A. (2016) ‘A time for global action: addressing girls’ menstrual hygiene management needs in schools’, PLOS Medicine 13(2): p. e1001962 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001962>. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Atuyambe, L.M., Lynn M., Ediau, M., Orach, C.G., Musenero, M. and Bazeyo, W. (2011) ‘Land slide disaster in eastern Uganda: rapid assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene situation in Bulucheke camp, Bududa district’, Environmental Health 10(38): 1–13 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-10-38>. · DOI
  17. Bosher, L. and Dainty, A. (2011) ‘Disaster risk reduction and “built-in” resilience: towards overarching principles for construction practice’, Disasters 35(1): 1–18 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01189.x>. · DOI
  18. Brown, J., Cavill, S., Cumming, O. and Jeandron, A. (2012) ‘Water, sanitation, and hygiene in emergencies: summary review and recommendations for further research’, Waterlines 31(1): 11–29 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2012.004>. · DOI
  19. Bryman, A. (2008) Social Research Methods, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Connolly, M., Gayer, M., Ryan, M.J., Spiegel, P., Salama, P. and Heymann, D.L. (2004) ‘Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges’, Lancet 364(9449): 1974–83 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17481-3>. · DOI
  21. Few, R., McAvoy, D., Tarazona, M. and Walden, V.M. (2013) Contribution to Change: An Approach to Evaluating the Role of Intervention in Disaster Recovery, Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing. · DOI
  22. King, K., Bosher, L.S. and Kayaga, S. (2013) ‘Resilience in the humanitarian sphere: stimulating resilience for recovery’, in R. Shaw (ed.), Proceedings of the 36th WEDC International Conference: Delivering Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Services in an Uncertain Environment, pp. 1–6, Loughborough: Water, Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University.
  23. Krishnan, S., Purwar, D. and Borah, B. (2015) ‘Sanitation and disasters: a case study of community and institutional response to Cyclone Phailin, Odisha 2013’, Waterlines 34(4): 412–23 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.034>. · DOI
  24. Muralidharan, A., Patil, H. and Patnaik, S. (2015) ‘Unpacking the policy landscape for menstrual hygiene management: implications for school WASH programmes in India’, Waterlines 34(1): 79–91 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.008>. · DOI
  25. Nawaz, J., Lal, S., Raza, S. and House, S. (2010) ‘Oxfam experience of providing screened toilet, bathing and menstruation units in its earthquake response in Pakistan’, Gender & Development 18: 81–9 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552071003600067>. · DOI
  26. O’Reilly, K., 2010. Combining sanitation and women’s participation in water supply: an example from Rajasthan. Development in Practice, 20(1), pp. 45–56. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09614520903436976> · DOI · Paper page
  27. Parker, A.H., Smith, J.A., Verdemato, T., Cooke, J., Webster, J. and Carter, R.C. (2014) ‘Menstrual management: a neglected aspect of hygiene interventions’, Disaster Prevention and Management 23(4): 437–54 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2013-0070>. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Parkinson, J. (2009) A Review of the Evidence Base for WASH Interventions in Emergency Responses, Atkins/UNICEF WASH Steering Group.
  29. Sommer, M. (2012) ‘Menstrual hygiene management in humanitarian emergencies: gaps and recommendations’, Waterlines 31(1–2): 83–104 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2012.008>. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sommer, M., Caruso, B.A., Sahin, M., Calderon, T., Cavill, S., Mahon, T. and Phillips-Howard, P.A. (2016) ‘A time for global action: addressing girls’ menstrual hygiene management needs in schools’, PLOS Medicine 13(2): p. e1001962 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001962>. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Atuyambe, L.M., Lynn M., Ediau, M., Orach, C.G., Musenero, M. and Bazeyo, W. (2011) ‘Land slide disaster in eastern Uganda: rapid assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene situation in Bulucheke camp, Bududa district’, Environmental Health 10(38): 1–13 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-10-38>. · DOI
  32. Bosher, L. and Dainty, A. (2011) ‘Disaster risk reduction and “built-in” resilience: towards overarching principles for construction practice’, Disasters 35(1): 1–18 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01189.x>. · DOI
  33. Brown, J., Cavill, S., Cumming, O. and Jeandron, A. (2012) ‘Water, sanitation, and hygiene in emergencies: summary review and recommendations for further research’, Waterlines 31(1): 11–29 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2012.004>. · DOI
  34. Bryman, A. (2008) Social Research Methods, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  35. Connolly, M., Gayer, M., Ryan, M.J., Spiegel, P., Salama, P. and Heymann, D.L. (2004) ‘Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges’, Lancet 364(9449): 1974–83 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17481-3>. · DOI
  36. Few, R., McAvoy, D., Tarazona, M. and Walden, V.M. (2013) Contribution to Change: An Approach to Evaluating the Role of Intervention in Disaster Recovery, Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing. · DOI
  37. King, K., Bosher, L.S. and Kayaga, S. (2013) ‘Resilience in the humanitarian sphere: stimulating resilience for recovery’, in R. Shaw (ed.), Proceedings of the 36th WEDC International Conference: Delivering Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Services in an Uncertain Environment, pp. 1–6, Loughborough: Water, Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University.
  38. Krishnan, S., Purwar, D. and Borah, B. (2015) ‘Sanitation and disasters: a case study of community and institutional response to Cyclone Phailin, Odisha 2013’, Waterlines 34(4): 412–23 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.034>. · DOI
  39. Muralidharan, A., Patil, H. and Patnaik, S. (2015) ‘Unpacking the policy landscape for menstrual hygiene management: implications for school WASH programmes in India’, Waterlines 34(1): 79–91 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.008>. · DOI
  40. Nawaz, J., Lal, S., Raza, S. and House, S. (2010) ‘Oxfam experience of providing screened toilet, bathing and menstruation units in its earthquake response in Pakistan’, Gender & Development 18: 81–9 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552071003600067>. · DOI
  41. O’Reilly, K., 2010. Combining sanitation and women’s participation in water supply: an example from Rajasthan. Development in Practice, 20(1), pp. 45–56. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09614520903436976> · DOI · Paper page
  42. Parker, A.H., Smith, J.A., Verdemato, T., Cooke, J., Webster, J. and Carter, R.C. (2014) ‘Menstrual management: a neglected aspect of hygiene interventions’, Disaster Prevention and Management 23(4): 437–54 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2013-0070>. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Parkinson, J. (2009) A Review of the Evidence Base for WASH Interventions in Emergency Responses, Atkins/UNICEF WASH Steering Group.
  44. Sommer, M. (2012) ‘Menstrual hygiene management in humanitarian emergencies: gaps and recommendations’, Waterlines 31(1–2): 83–104 <http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2012.008>. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Sommer, M., Caruso, B.A., Sahin, M., Calderon, T., Cavill, S., Mahon, T. and Phillips-Howard, P.A. (2016) ‘A time for global action: addressing girls’ menstrual hygiene management needs in schools’, PLOS Medicine 13(2): p. e1001962 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001962>. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sneha Krishnan, S. K., & John Twigg, J. T.
Venue
Waterlines
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
265-276
ISSN
  • 0262-8104 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-3488
OpenAlex
W2498158905
Cited by
39
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waterlines (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
Keywords
menstrual hygiene management, disaster recovery, post-disaster relief, women's privacy, women's safety, adolescent girls, Cyclone Phailin, Odisha, sanitary pads, sociocultural practices, behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review