The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SMASHING THE CRYSTAL BALL. A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE DUTCH NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL PREDICTIVE MODEL (IKAW)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“archaeological applications of predictive models are often insufficient due to small training data sets, inadequate statistical techniques, and a lack of theoretical insight to explain the responses of past land use to predictor variables.”
From Advancing predictive modeling in archaeology: an evaluation of regression and machine learning methods on the grand staircase-escalante national monument (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Making space for an archaeology of place
University of Southampton, & Wheatley, D. (2004) · Internet Archaeology · doi:10.11141/ia.15.10 · Cited by 88
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1080/00438243.1992.9980207 · DOI · Paper page
- Dalen, J. van, 1999. Probability Modelling: A Bayesian and a Geometric Example, in M. Gillings, D. Mattingly and J. van Dalen eds, Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology (The Archaeology of Mediterranean Landscapes 3), 117–124. Oxford: Oxbow.
- Deeben J., 2002, Berichten ROB, 45, 9
- Ducke, B., 2005. Regional scale archaeological predictive modelling in north-eastern Germany, in F. Niccolucci ed. Beyond the artefact – Proceedings of CAA2004 – Prato 13–17 April 2004.Archaeolingua, Budapest.
- Ebert, J. I., 2000. The State of the Art in “Inductive” Predictive Modeling: Seven Big Mistakes (and Lots of Smaller Ones), in K. L. Wescott and R. J. Brandon eds, Practical Applications of GIS For Archaeologists. A Predictive Modeling Kit, 129–134. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Ellen, R., 1982. Environment, subsistence and system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Kamermans, H., J. Deeben, D. Hallewas, M. van Leusen, P. Verhagen and P. Zoetbrood, 2004. Deconstructing the Crystal Ball: The State of the Art of Predictive Modelling for Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands, in Stadtarchäologie Wien ed. Enter the Past. The E-way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage, 175 (BAR International Series 1227) and CD-ROM (25 pages). Oxford: Archaeopress.
- Kohler, T. A. and S. C. Parker, 1986. Predictive models for archaeological resource location, in M. B. Schiffer ed. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Volume 9, 397–452. New York: Academic Press. · DOI
- Kvamme, K. L., 1990. The Fundamental principles and Practice of Predictive Archaeological modeling, in A. Voorrips ed. Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, Studies in Modern Archaeology, Vol. 3, 257–295. Bonn: Holos-Verlag.
- Leusen, P. M. van, 1995. GIS and Archaeological Resource Management: A European Agenda, in G. Lock and Z. Stančič eds, Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems, 27–41. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Leusen, P. M. van, 1996. GIS and Locational Modeling in Dutch Archaeology; A Review of Current Approaches, in H. D. G. Maschner ed. New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research. Occasional Paper no. 23, 177–197. Southern Illinois University: Center for Archaeological Investigations.
- Verhagen, P., 2006. Quantifying the Qualified: The Use of Multi-Criteria Methods and Bayesian Statistics for the Development of Archaeological Predictive Models, in M. Mehrer and K. Wescott eds, GIS and Archaeological Predictive Modeling. Boca Raton, Florida USA: CRC Press, 191–216. · DOI · Paper page
- Verhagen, P., 2007. Predictive models put to the test, in Verhagen, P.Case Studies in Archaeological Predictive Modeling. ASLU 14, 115–168. Leiden University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Verhagen, P., H. Kamermans, M. van Leusen, J. Deeben, D. Hallewas and P. Zoetbrood, 2007. First thoughts on the incorporation of cultural variables into predictive modelling, in Verhagen, P.Case Studies in Archaeological Predictive Modelling. ASLU 14. Leiden University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Verhagen, P., J. Deeben, D. Hallewas, P. Zoetbrood, H. Kamermans and M. van Leusen, 2005. A Review of Predictive Modelling for Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands, in J.F. Berger, F. Bertoncello, F. Braemer, G. Davtian and M. Gazenbeek eds. Temps et espaces de l'homme en société, analyses et modèles spatiaux en archéologie. XXVe rencontres internationales d'archéologie et d'histoire d'Antibes, 83–92. Antibes: Éditions APDCA.
- Wescott, K. L. and R. J. Brandon eds, 2000. Practical Applications of GIS For Archaeologists. A Predictive Modeling Kit. London: Taylor & Francis. · DOI
- Whitley, T. G., 2004. Causality and Cross-purposes in Archaeological Predictive Modeling, in Stadtarchäologie Wien ed. Enter the Past. The E-way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage(BAR International Series 1227), 236–9 and CD-ROM (17 pages). Oxford: Archaeopress.
- Woodman, P. E. and M. Woodward, 2002. The use and abuse of statistical methods in archaeological site location modelling, in D. Wheatley, G. Earl and S. Poppy eds, Contemporary Themes in Archaeological Computing. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yaworsky, P. M., Vernon, K. B., Spangler, J. D., Brewer, S. C., & Codding, B. F. (2020) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239424 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- KAMERMANS, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing
- Publisher
- Edinburgh University Press
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-84
- ISSN
- 1753-8548
- 1755-1706
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
