The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits
Abstract
The choice of policy mechanisms for encouraging environmentally beneficial land-use change should depend on the relative levels of private (or internal) net benefits, and public (or external) net benefits. A map of recommended policy mechanisms is developed, depending on the relative levels of these variables. Positive incentives, negative incentives, and extension need to be targeted carefully to appropriate projects—where private net benefits are closer to zero, and/or public net benefits are more extremely positive or negative. Technology development is suggested where private net costs outweigh public net benefits. No action is recommended for many potential projects. (JEL Q58, Q24)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278 · Cited by 2,798
Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research
Knowler, D., & Bradshaw, B. (2007) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,839
Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders
Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., & Wilkinson, R. (2006) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea05037 · Cited by 1,464
Self-citationThe Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation
(2001) · The Strengths and Weaknesses of Environmental Choice Modelling · doi:10.4337/9781781956601 · Cited by 779
Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial
Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., & Strappazzon, L. (2003) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00224.x · Cited by 486
Auctioning Conservation Contracts: A Theoretical Analysis and an Application
Latacz‐Lohmann, U., & Van der Hamsvoort, C. (1997) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/1244139 · Cited by 425
Brent, R. J. (1996) · Cited by 388
Conserving Tropical Biodiversity amid Weak Institutions
BARRETT, C. B., BRANDON, K., GIBSON, C., & GJERTSEN, H. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0497:ctbawi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 354
Participatory forestry: the process of change in India and Nepal.
Hobley, M. (1996) · Overseas Development Institute (ODI). eBooks · Cited by 244
(2007) · The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5313-4 · Cited by 227
Cited by
The Roles of Adoption and Behavior Change in Agricultural Policy
Pannell, D. J., & Claassen, R. (2020) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13009 · Cited by 123
Self-citationBennett, L. T., Mele, P. M., Annett, S., & Kasel, S. (2010) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.06.017 · Cited by 100
Läpple, D., Hennessy, T., & Newman, C. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12000 · Cited by 94
The adopters versus the technology: which matters more when predicting or explaining adoption?
de Oca Munguia, O. M., & Llewellyn, R. (2020) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13007 · Cited by 90
Overcoming barriers to the adoption of climate-friendly practices in agriculture
(2017) · OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers · doi:10.1787/97767de8-en · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Pannell, D. J.
- Venue
- Land Economics
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2008-05-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-240
- ISSN
- 0023-7639 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-8325
- OpenAlex
- W1790739296
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 47.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3368/le.84.2.225
- The paper
- Pannell, D. J. (2008). Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits. Land Economics. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.2.225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
