Attenuating oneself: An active inference perspective on “selfless” experiences
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we address reports of “selfless” experiences from the perspective of active inference and predictive processing. Our argument builds upon grounding self-modelling in active inference as action planning and precision control within deep generative models – thus establishing a link between computational mechanisms and phenomenal selfhood. We propose that “selfless” experiences can be interpreted as (rare) cases in which normally congruent processes of computational and phenomenal self-modelling diverge in an otherwise conscious system. We discuss two potential mechanisms – within the Bayesian mechanics of active inference – that could lead to such a divergence by attenuating the experience of selfhood: “self-flattening” via reduction in the depth of active inference and “self-attenuation” via reduction of the expected precision of self-evidence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Bayesian Learning Models of Pain: A Call to Action
Tabor, A., & Burr, C. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.10.006 · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…lack of central coherence in psychiatric syndromes in particular, such as organic psychosyndromes (Collerton, Perry, & McKeith, 2005), chronic pain (Tabor & Burr, 2019), functional motor symptoms (Edwards et al., 2012), autism (Lawson, Rees, & Friston, 2014; Pellicano & Burr, 2012; Van de Cruys et…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From many to (n)one: Meditation and the plasticity of the predictive mind
Laukkonen, R. E., & Slagter, H. A. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.021 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Expecting some action: predictive processing and the construction of conscious experience
Nave, K., Deane, G., Miller, M., & Clark, A. (2022) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-022-00644-y · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Deane, G. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab024 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Active inference as a computational framework for consciousness
Vilas, M. G., Auksztulewicz, R., & Melloni, L. (2022) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00579-w · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Limanowski, J., & Friston, K.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Philosophy and the Mind Sciences
- Published
- 2020-03-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- I
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 2699-0369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025322213
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophy and the Mind Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- selfhood, active inference, predictive processing, self-modeling, action planning, precision control, deep generative models, Bayesian inference, self-attenuation, phenomenal self
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review