The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing Negative: The Non-Consequences of COVID-19 on Mass Ideology
Abstract
Responding to COVID-19, governments implemented large-scale economic and social policies of unprecedented scale. This highlighted the state's capacity to guarantee economic and health security, and affected demographic groups that are less commonly beneficiaries of state support. We hypothesise that exposure to the pandemic and these policy responses caused change in attitudes to the role of government in the economy and redistribution. We test this expectation using data from the (2014–present) British Election Study panel, together with a unique panel survey fielded to existing BES respondents in April and September, 2020. We find virtually no evidence of any effect on ideological beliefs. Moreover, using a survey experiment, we find exposure to cues linking the pandemic to greater roles for government has no impact on ideological beliefs. We conclude that such elite rhetoric, even if it had been present in the field, would not have yielded ideological change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Using detailed panel data from the British Election Study, Blumenau et al. (2021) show that there has been little aggregate change in redistribution preferences in the UK between 2014 and 2020.”
From COVID-19 and welfare state support: the case of universal basic income (2022) · cites this paper as Blumenau et al., 2021
In the citing paper
“Panel studies also reveal no clear changes on broader social policy preferences over the pandemic (see e.g., Ares et al., 2020;Blumenau et al., 2021;Enggist et al., 2021).”
From COVID-19 and welfare state support: the case of universal basic income (2022) · cites this paper as Blumenau et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,150
The logic of congressional action
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4778 · Cited by 1,798
Sociotropic Politics: The American Case
Kinder, D. R., & Kiewiet, D. R. (1981) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400002544 · Cited by 1,519
Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-2440 · Cited by 1,173
Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution
Fong, C. (2001) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00141-9 · Cited by 1,137
An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences
Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400400079 · Cited by 1,101
Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E. L. (. L., & Sacerdote, B. (2001) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2001.0014 · Cited by 936
Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action
Soss, J. (1999) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585401 · Cited by 815
The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?
Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A., & Loewen, P. J. (2021) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12401 · Cited by 701
Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession
Margalit, Y. M. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000603 · Cited by 659
Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict
Berinsky, A. J. (2007) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00602.x · Cited by 555
The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution
LUPU, N., & PONTUSSON, J. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000128 · Cited by 484
Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution
Cusack, T. R., Iversen, T., & Rehm, P. (2006) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grj022 · Cited by 472
The submerged state: how invisible government policies undermine American democracy
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5960 · Cited by 391
Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States.
Baker, P., & Skocpol, T. (1993) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2166848 · Cited by 389
The Delegated Welfare StateMedicare, Markets, and the Governance of Social Policy
Morgan, K. J., & Campbell, A. L. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730346.001.0001 · Cited by 350
Esaiasson, P., Sohlberg, J., Ghersetti, M., & Johansson, B. (2021) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12419 · Cited by 342
Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government
Levin, M. (2018) · The European Legacy · doi:10.1080/10848770.2018.1449397 · Cited by 341
Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment.
O'Connor, J. J., & Pierson, P. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2077364 · Cited by 341
Chong, D., Citrin, J., & Conley, P. (2001) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00253 · Cited by 321
Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State
REHM, P., HACKER, J. S., & SCHLESINGER, M. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000147 · Cited by 315
Petersen, M. B., Slothuus, R., Stubager, R., & Togeby, L. (2011) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01923.x · Cited by 311
Social Welfare as Small‐Scale Help: Evolutionary Psychology and the Deservingness Heuristic
Petersen, M. B. (2012) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00545.x · Cited by 302
Political Responses to Economic Shocks
Margalit, Y. M. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713 · Cited by 280
The Conscription of Wealth: Mass Warfare and the Demand for Progressive Taxation
Scheve, K. F., & Stasavage, D. (2010) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818310000226 · Cited by 278
Social Policy by Popular Demand
Rehm, P. (2011) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887111000037 · Cited by 270
Clifford, S., Sheagley, G., & Piston, S. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000241 · Cited by 264
The Two Facets of Social Policy Preferences
Cavaillé, C., & Trump, K.-S. (2015) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/678312 · Cited by 241
Bækgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J. K., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Public Administration · doi:10.30636/jbpa.32.172 · Cited by 236
Owens, L. A., & Pedulla, D. S. (2013) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sot101 · Cited by 156
A Broken Public? Americans’ Responses to the Great Recession
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413498255 · Cited by 152
Jacobs, L. R., & Mettler, S. B. (2018) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592717004182 · Cited by 144
Personal Experience and Public Opinion: A Theory and Test of Conditional Policy Feedback
Lerman, A. E., & McCabe, K. T. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/689286 · Cited by 138
Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy
Miller, J. (2000) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.51.8.1053 · Cited by 92
How do Economic Circumstances Determine Preferences? Evidence from Long-run Panel Data
O’Grady, T. (2017) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000242 · Cited by 92
Self-citationTilley, J. R., Neundorf, A., & HOBOLT, S. B. (2018) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/694549 · Cited by 88
Reeskens, T., Muis, Q., Sieben, I., et al. (2020) · European Societies · doi:10.1080/14616696.2020.1821075 · Cited by 75
Ares, M., Bürgisser, R., & Häusermann, S. (2021) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2021.1924736 · Cited by 74
All in: Market expectations of eurozone integrity in the sovereign debt crisis
Chang, M., & Leblond, P. (2014) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.941905 · Cited by 71
Langsæther, P. E., Evans, G. M., & O’Grady, T. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123420000599 · Cited by 63
Self-citationSocial Identity, Availability and the Perception of Risk
Stapel, D. A., Reicher, S. D., & Spears, R. (1994) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1994.12.1.1 · Cited by 60
Healy, A., Persson, M., & Snowberg, E. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2885246 · Cited by 50
Changing classes, changing preferences: how social class mobility affects economic preferences
Ares, M. (2019) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1644575 · Cited by 45
Modeling Dynamic Preferences: A Bayesian Robust Dynamic Latent Ordered Probit Model
Stegmueller, D. (2013) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpt001 · Cited by 43
Hopkins, D. J., & Parish, K. (2018) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfz004 · Cited by 39
Demand for Redistribution: Individuals’ Responses to Economic Setbacks
Martén, L. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/sjoe.12276 · Cited by 26
Are There Long-Term Effects of the Vietnam Draft on Political Attitudes or Behavior? Apparently Not
GREEN, D. P., Davenport, T. C., & Hanson, K. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2018.18 · Cited by 10
Vaughn, L. A., & Weary, G. (2002) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.21.6.686.22794 · Cited by 9
Going beyond values versus self-interest: whose attitudes change after employment transitions?
Wehl, N. (2020) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2020.1809473 · Cited by 8
Divisive jobs: three facets of risk, precarity, and redistribution
Pahontu, R. L. (2021) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.45 · Cited by 8
From Tiger to PIIGS: Ireland and the use of heuristics in comparative political economyPreprint
Brazys, S. R., & Hardiman, N. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
SoRelle, M. E. (2020) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.1002/polq.13124 · Cited by 5
Cited by
COVID-19 and welfare state support: the case of universal basic income
Weisstanner, D. (2022) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1093/polsoc/puab015 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Blumenau, J., Hicks, T., Jacobs, A., Matthews, S., & O'Grady, T.
- Affiliations
- University College London
- University of British Columbia
- Memorial University of Newfoundland
- ORCID
- Hicks, Timothy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2021-09-28
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 55
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.