Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—Implications for broiler chicken health and performance

Open access
Rinttilä, T., Apajalahti, J.·2013·Journal of Applied Poultry Research

Abstract

Microbiota in the intestine of an animal species has evolved together with the host. This coevolution has produced specific host-microbe combinations, called superorganisms, with the best possible fitness in a given environment. Intestinal microbiota has an enormous metabolic potential and it affects both the nutrition and health of the host. The importance of intestinal microbiota for the performance of broiler chickens has been studied for decades. The microbial community structure of the cecum is significantly more complex and less well characterized than that of the crop and small intestine. Culture-independent molecular techniques have recently been introduced to bring fresh insights into the intestinal system of the broiler chicken. As a consequence, there is growing evidence of connection between the apparent metabolizable energy of the diet and microbiota composition in the hindgut of the host. This connection can be due to direct conversion of some dietary components into high-energy metabolites by specialized bacteria. The utilization of such fermentation end products would provide more energy for the host, which could be measured as improved feed conversion efficiency. However, it is also possible that cecal microbial profile is a reflection of feed digestion and nutrient absorption efficiency in the proximal intestine. Disorders in these functions cause excess nutrient bypass to the lower intestine, providing new, easily available substrates for bacteria that could otherwise not compete in that habitat. The 2 causal links described are likely to coexist in real life situations, but their relative dominance warrants further well-designed studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3382/japr.2013-00742

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Rinttilä, T., & Apajalahti, J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Poultry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
647-658
ISSN
1056-6171 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159831837
Cited by
349
References
7
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—Implications for broiler chicken health and performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3382/japr.2013-00742
The paper
Rinttilä, T., & Apajalahti, J. (2013). Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—Implications for broiler chicken health and performance. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.