Cited by 853Probiotics and Fermented FoodsBacteriophages and microbial interactionsListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the antiinfective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118

Open access
Corr, Sinéad C., Li, Yin, Riedel, Christian U., O'Toole, Paul W., Hill, Colin, Gahan, Cormac G. M.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The mechanisms by which probiotic strains enhance the health of the host remain largely uncharacterized. Here we demonstrate that Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118, a recently sequenced and genetically tractable probiotic strain of human origin, produces a bacteriocin in vivo that can significantly protect mice against infection with the invasive foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. A stable mutant of Lb. salivarius UCC118 that is unable to produce the Abp118 bacteriocin also failed to protect mice against infection with two strains of L. monocytogenes, EGDe and LO28, confirming that bacteriocin production is the primary mediator of protection against this organism. Furthermore, Lb. salivarius UCC118 did not offer any protection when mice were infected with a strain of L. monocytogenes expressing the cognate Abp118 immunity protein AbpIM, confirming that the antimicrobial effect is a result of direct antagonism between Lb. salivarius and the pathogen, mediated by the bacteriocin Abp118.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0700440104

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inhibitory activities of the bacterial isolates might be effective as a result of the production of antimicrobial substances such as lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins.

    “The inhibitory activities of bacterial isolates might be effective as a result of the production of antimicrobial substances such as lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins [43,44].”

    From Bioprophylactic potential of novel human colostrum probiotics via apoptotic induction of colon cancer cells and cell immune activation (2022) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results section reports that bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118 inhibited Listeria and reduced infection in mice, supporting bacteriocins as one possible mechanism. The passages do not support lactic acid or hydrogen peroxide as explanations for the isolates’ inhibitory activity; a search for those terms found no such finding. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Horton RM, Cai Z, Ho SN, Pease LR. Biotechniques. 1990;8:528–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corr, S. C., Li, Y., Riedel, C. U., O'Toole, P. W., Hill, C., & Gahan, C. G. M.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • *Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre and Department of Microbiology and
Corresponding author
Hill, Colin
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-05
Volume
104
Issue
18
Pages
7617-7621
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1987838634
Cited by
853
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 61
FWCI
66.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Keywords
bacteriocin production, Listeria monocytogenes, antimicrobial antagonism, probiotic mechanisms of action
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Bacteriocins, Lactobacillus, Liver Diseases, Mutation, Spleen, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review