The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Volatility and Dispersion in Business Growth Rates: Publicly Traded versus Privately Held Firms
Open accessAbstract
We study the variability of business growth rates in the U.S. private sector from 1976 onwards.To carry out our study, we exploit the recently developed Longitudinal Business Database (LBD), which contains annual observations on employment and payroll for all U.S. businesses.Our central finding is a large secular decline in the cross sectional dispersion of firm growth rates and in the average magnitude of firm level volatility.Measured the same way as in other recent research, the employment-weighted mean volatility of firm growth rates has declined by more than 40% since 1982.This result stands in sharp contrast to previous findings of rising volatility for publicly traded firms in COMPUSTAT data.We confirm the rise in volatility among publicly traded firms using the LBD, but we show that its impact is overwhelmed by declining volatility among privately held firms.This pattern holds in every major industry group.Employment shifts toward older businesses account for 27 percent or more of the volatility decline among privately held firms.Simple cohort effects that capture higher volatility among more recently listed firms account for most of the volatility rise among publicly traded firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entry Restrictions, Industry Evolution, and Dynamic Efficiency: Evidence From Commercial Banking
Jayaratne, J., & Strahan, P. E. (1998) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/467390 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty*
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjw024 · Cited by 12,458
Self-citationThe rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications
De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz041 · Cited by 1,893
Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Reenen, J. V. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.167 · Cited by 1,028
Democratizing entry: Banking deregulations, financing constraints, and entrepreneurship☆
Kerr, W. R., & Nanda, R. (2009) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.12.003 · Cited by 679
Glaeser, E. L., & Kerr, W. R. (2009) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00225.x · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, S., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2006-07
- Pages
- 107-180
- OpenAlex
- W1543428816
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volatility and Dispersion in Business Growth Rates: Publicly Traded versus Privately Held Firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w12354
- The paper
- Davis, S., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2006). Volatility and Dispersion in Business Growth Rates: Publicly Traded versus Privately Held Firms. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.