The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subjective Well-Being, Income, Economic Development and Growth
Open accessAbstract
We explore the relationships between subjective well-being and income, as seen across individuals within a given country, between countries in a given year, and as a country grows through time.We show that richer individuals in a given country are more satisfied with their lives than are poorer individuals, and establish that this relationship is similar in most countries around the world.Turning to the relationship between countries, we show that average life satisfaction is higher in countries with greater GDP per capita.The magnitude of the satisfaction-income gradient is roughly the same whether we compare individuals or countries, suggesting that absolute income plays an important role in influencing wellbeing.Finally, studying changes in satisfaction over time, we find that as countries experience economic growth, their citizens' life satisfaction typically grows, and that those countries experiencing more rapid economic growth also tend to experience more rapid growth in life satisfaction.These results together suggest that measured subjective well-being grows hand in hand with material living standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence
EASTERLIN, R. A. (1974) · Nations and Households in Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7 · Cited by 4,474
Happiness: Lessons from a New Science
Cooper, R. N., & Layard, R. (2005) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20031793 · Cited by 4,083
Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533006776526030 · Cited by 3,177
Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?
Easterlin, R. A. (1995) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-b · Cited by 3,116
Cantril, H. (1965) · Cited by 2,273
Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.305 · Cited by 1,946
Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?
Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.4.45 · Cited by 1,894
Income, Health, and Well-Being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll
Deaton, A. (2008) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.22.2.53 · Cited by 1,636
Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being
Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/120.3.963 · Cited by 1,583
Hedonic relativism and planning the good society
Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,357
Cited by
Direct Estimation of Equivalence Scales and More Evidence on Independence of Base
Biewen, M., & Juhasz, A. (2017) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/obes.12166 · Cited by 28
Inhibitory control within the context of early life poverty and implications for outcomes
Taylor, R. L., & Barch, D. M. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104778 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2010-10
- OpenAlex
- W3122236153
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 41
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subjective Well-Being, Income, Economic Development and Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w16441
- The paper
- Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective Well-Being, Income, Economic Development and Growth. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.