Cited by 202Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityHistorical Economic and Social StudiesGlobal trade and economics

Technical Change and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: The United States in Historical Perspective

Open access
Katz, Lawrence, Margo, Robert·2013·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper examines shifts over time in the relative demand for skilled labor in the United States.Although de-skilling in the conventional sense did occur overall in nineteenth century manufacturing, a more nuanced picture is that occupations "hollowed out": the share of "middle-skill" jobs -artisans -declined while those of "high-skill" -white collar, non-production workers -and "low-skill" -operatives and laborers increased.De-skilling did not occur in the aggregate economy; rather, the aggregate shares of low skill jobs decreased, middle skill jobs remained steady, and high skill jobs expanded from 1850 to the early twentieth century.The pattern of monotonic skill upgrading continued through much of the twentieth century until the recent "polarization" of labor demand since the late 1980s.New archival evidence on wages suggests that the demand for high skill (white collar) workers grew more rapidly than the supply starting well before the Civil War.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w18752

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature on the fourth industrial revolution has remained narrowly focused on the question of skills and whether human and AI are substitutes or complements on the labour market.

    “The literature on the fourth industrial revolution however has remained narrowly focused on the question of skills and whether human and AI are substitutes or complements on the labour market (Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 2000; Autor 2013; Katz and Margo 2013; Acemoglu 2014; Frey and Osborne, 2017; Genz et al. 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, L., & Margo, R.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2013-02
Pages
15-57
OpenAlex
W1492608959
Cited by
202
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
Keywords
skill upgrading, deskilling, occupational structure, middle-skill jobs, artisans, white-collar workers, low-skilled workers, wage differentials, nineteenth-century manufacturing, American labor history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review