Technical Change and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: The United States in Historical Perspective
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines shifts over time in the relative demand for skilled labor in the United States.Although de-skilling in the conventional sense did occur overall in nineteenth century manufacturing, a more nuanced picture is that occupations "hollowed out": the share of "middle-skill" jobs -artisans -declined while those of "high-skill" -white collar, non-production workers -and "low-skill" -operatives and laborers increased.De-skilling did not occur in the aggregate economy; rather, the aggregate shares of low skill jobs decreased, middle skill jobs remained steady, and high skill jobs expanded from 1850 to the early twentieth century.The pattern of monotonic skill upgrading continued through much of the twentieth century until the recent "polarization" of labor demand since the late 1980s.New archival evidence on wages suggests that the demand for high skill (white collar) workers grew more rapidly than the supply starting well before the Civil War.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature on the fourth industrial revolution has remained narrowly focused on the question of skills and whether human and AI are substitutes or complements on the labour market.
“The literature on the fourth industrial revolution however has remained narrowly focused on the question of skills and whether human and AI are substitutes or complements on the labour market (Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 2000; Autor 2013; Katz and Margo 2013; Acemoglu 2014; Frey and Osborne, 2017; Genz et al. 2018).”
From Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy (2021) · cites this paper as Katz and Margo 2013
Cites
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205 · see citing works
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727 · see citing works
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611 · see citing works
“…has remained nar-rowly focused on the question of skills and whether human and AI are substitutes or complements on the labour market (Acemoglu, Autor, Dorn, Hanson, & Price, 2014; Autor, 2013; Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 2000; Frey & Osborne, 2017; Genz, Lehmer, & Janser, 2018; Katz & Margo, 2013).”
BackgroundWhy Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation
Autor, D. H. (2015) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3 · Cited by 3,917 · see citing works
Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs
Autor, D. (2024) · doi:10.3386/w32140 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“Why Is Labor Receiving a Smaller Share of Global Income? Theory and Empirical Evidence”
Dao, M., Das, M., Koczan, Z., & Lian, W. (2017) · IMF Working Papers · doi:10.5089/9781484311042.001 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Katz, L., & Margo, R.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- ORCID
- Margo, Robert
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2013-02
- Pages
- 15-57
- OpenAlex
- W1492608959
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Keywords
- skill upgrading, deskilling, occupational structure, middle-skill jobs, artisans, white-collar workers, low-skilled workers, wage differentials, nineteenth-century manufacturing, American labor history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review