The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Declining Competition and Investment in the U.S.
Open accessAbstract
The U.S. business sector has under-invested relative to Tobin's Q since the early 2000's.We argue that declining competition is partly responsible for this phenomenon.We use a combination of natural experiments and instrumental variables to establish a causal relationship between competition and investment.Within manufacturing, we show that industry leaders invest and innovate more in response to exogenous changes in Chinese competition.Beyond manufacturing we show that excess entry in the late 1990's, which is orthogonal to demand shocks in the 2000's, predicts higher industry investment given Q.Finally, we provide some evidence that the increase in concentration can be explained by increasing regulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 · Cited by 4,459
Overconfidence and Speculative Bubbles
Scheinkman, J. A., & Xiong, W. (2003) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/378531 · Cited by 2,198
Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R. W., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1306944 · Cited by 2,117
Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation
Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1982) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297136 · Cited by 1,958
The Venture Capital Revolution
Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.2.145 · Cited by 1,934
Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries
Dunne, T., Roberts, M. J., & Samuelson, L. (1988) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555454 · Cited by 1,651
Claus, J., & Thomas, J. (2001) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00384 · Cited by 1,515
Markups and Firm-Level Export Status
Loecker, J. D., & Warzynski, F. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.6.2437 · Cited by 1,424
The Surprisingly Swift Decline of US Manufacturing Employment
Pierce, J. R., & Schott, P. K. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20131578 · Cited by 1,363
The China Shock: Learning from Labor-Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015041 · Cited by 1,305 · cited 7×
“The ‘China shock’ has been used in a variety of studies, including Acemoglu et al. (2016); Autor et al. (2016); Pierce and Schott (2016), among others.”
Influential
Cited by
The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications
De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz041 · Cited by 1,893
Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation
Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A., & Hodson, J. (2024) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745 · Cited by 1,460
Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24001 · Cited by 773
Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sorensen, B. E., Villegas-Sanchez, C., Volosovych, V., & Yesiltas, S. (2015) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2660191 · Cited by 223
(2018) · OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers · doi:10.1787/4efe2d25-en · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutiérrez, G., & Philippon, T.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2017-07
- OpenAlex
- W2738454884
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 60
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Declining Competition and Investment in the U.S. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w23583
- The paper
- Gutiérrez, G., & Philippon, T. (2017). Declining Competition and Investment in the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.