Cited by 74School Choice and PerformanceParental Involvement in EducationIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

It Takes a Village: The Economics of Parenting with Neighborhood and Peer Effects

Agostinelli, Francesco, Doepke, Matthias, Sorrenti, Giuseppe, Zilibotti, Fabrizio·2020·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

As children reach adolescence, peer interactions become increasingly central to their development, whereas the direct influence of parents wanes. Nevertheless, parents may continue to exert leverage by shaping their children's peer groups. We study interactions of parenting style and peer effects in a model where children's skill accumulation depends on both parental inputs and peers, and where parents can affect the peer group by restricting who their children can interact with. We estimate the model and show that it can capture empirical patterns regarding the interaction of peer characteristics, parental behavior, and skill accumulation among US high school students. We use the estimated model for policy simulations. We find that interventions (e.g., busing) that move children to a more favorable neighborhood have large effects but lose impact when they are scaled up because parents' equilibrium responses push against successful integration with the new peer group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w27050

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endogenous peer group formation can amplify educational inequality, because homophily bias implies that socio-economic differences across families are reproduced in the peer connections children make in schools and neighborhoods.

    “Endogenous peer group formation can amplify educational inequality, because homophily bias (the tendency to associate with peers who are similar to oneself) implies that socio-economic differences across families are reproduced in the peer connections children make in schools and neighborhoods (Agostinelli et al. 2020).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Agostinelli et al. 2020

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agostinelli, F., Doepke, M., Sorrenti, G., & Zilibotti, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2020-04
OpenAlex
W3017166378
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
parenting styles, peer effects, neighborhood effects, skill accumulation, adolescent development, peer group formation, busing, school integration, high school students, policy simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review