The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity
Open accessAbstract
Using data from a unique nationally representative sample of businesses, the Educational Quality of the Workforce National Employers Survey (EQW-NES), matched with the Bureau of the Census' Longitudinal Research Database (LRD), we examine the impact of workplace practices, information technology, and human capital investments on productivity. We estimate an augmented Cobb Douglas production function with both cross section and panel data covering the period of 1987-1993 using both within and GMM estimators. We find that what is associated with higher productivity is not so much whether or not an employer adopts a particular work practice but rather how that work practice is actually implemented within the establishment. We also find that those unionized establishments that have adopted what have been called new or "transformed" industrial relations practices that promote joint decision making coupled with incentive based compensation have higher productivty than other similar non-union plants, while those businesses that are unionized but maintain more traditional labor management relations have lower productivity. We also find that the higher the average educational level of production workers or the greater the proportion of non-managerial workers who use computers, the higher is plant productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Cited by
Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2006) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w12216 · Cited by 1,450
Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. M. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.922368 · Cited by 836
Tracking Firm Use of AI in Real Time: A Snapshot from the Business Trends and Outlook Survey
Bonney, K., Breaux, C., Buffington, C., Dinlersoz, E., Foster, L., Goldschlag, N., Haltiwanger, J., Kroff, Z., & Savage, K. (2024) · doi:10.3386/w32319 · Cited by 32
Ben Youssef, A., Dahmani, M., & Omrani, N. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2065366 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Black, S., & Lynch, L.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1997-08
- OpenAlex
- W2084487040
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w6120
- The paper
- Black, S., & Lynch, L. (1997). How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.